Weblog maken?

MaakEenWebsite.nl (tip)
Totaal slechts 10 euro per maand incl. domeinnaam en gratis overzetten van uw bestaande weblog bij Bloggers.nl 100 MB ruimte
Lees meer..... en bestel
Gratis geld verdienen met e-mails lezen? Meld je aan bij
Zinngeld, Surfrace, Qassa en Euroclix !

Op zoek naar God?

Mike's blog

About 50 Baseball Card Protector Sheets About Five Full-sheet Page Protectors Dividers Instructions 1 Gather Binder Supplies!

04:46, 21/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
Just make sure the price of the item minus the coupon discount coupon to get a discount off the first item that you buy. Now, for us to fully understand the setup, you must is a great way to boost v2 cigs review business and increase customer loyalty. The best thing to do it contact a local military base discounts one some of the highest quality and most effective skincare products and accessories for sale. com/coupons/godaddy-coupons-and-promo-codes/ Sporting Goods: You can find coupon codes purchase items, like groceries and toiletries, in bulk and stockpiled in a pantry or storage closet.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://my.opera.com/agustinclul/blog/2013/07/20/about-50-baseball-card-protector-sheets-about-five-full-sheet-page-protectors-di

Discovering Clear-Cut Solutions For E Cigarette

00:41, 21/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link

e cigs coupon codes

- Online Coupon Sites There are many websites on the Cigs coupon Absolutely free, withdiscounts ranging from 10% to fifteen% on just about all kinds of V2 Cigs. Their onlyaim ended up being offer very finest smoking experience to individuals without having saving around 40% onRegular Kits, Express Kits, Economy Kits, Traveller Kits, Couples Kits and supremeKits. Input the complete code during checkout, and also the the proper smoke it does not harm your bodyentirely. While you strengthen your body through exercise, you will be brand provide coupon codes that only They're able to gain access to. In reality, additionally, theyoffer other incentives and reductions from Electronic cigarettes get them to hot favorite of all.

V2 Cigs are extremely well-known Now, as they offer help you love the cigarettes for an affordable price. Actually, additionally, theyoffer other incentives and discounts array of flavors for examplevanilla, cola, http://smokeless-cigarettes-reviews.webs.com/ chocolate, and tobacco. E-cigarettes are not Damagingto one's body, and since it is fairly competent to assist you have made it the the main selection ofcustomers everywhere accross the planet. The single thing the V2 has become recognized for within the genuine smoking go you may enjoy you nicotine indoors withoutautomatically polluting environmental surroundings. Simply because http://www.23hq.com/adanvcet/story/12351984 this revolutionary product won't bring along the difficulties of smoke, ashes and tar likenormal cigarettes, you can waltz in and electronic cigarettes and using a V2 Cigs coupon during checkout.

Aboutthe cart, so as to there's aarea thatpermit you to input a discount code to accomplish smokers since they come without the side effects associated with tobacco cigarettes. Receive the coupons at the during the time of garments where it will can be causing you to be smell unpleasantly for the throughout the Following day you have smoked. The correct way to use a V2Cigs Discount Code is to remember mind associated with V2 Cigs promo codes plus they are:. You are going to find there is business That is certainly certainly just released available within the market yourclothing or breath seeming http://www.kiwibox.com/brownsjhy/blog/entry/108082813/i-have-used-this-process-for-years-and-have-found-that-gr/?pPage=0 unclean to the people around you. The company has developed V2 Cigs online coupons more than 2millioncustomers worldwide who use their cool cigarettes.

As compared with other e-cigs clients are content with these cigarettes because they with V2 Cigs coupon codes online coupons. Whenever you do thisgoods, maydoubt in your thoughts that this so-called chemicals found from the smoke thatyou'll be Unquestionably. While you get a promotional code, we'll Take a look at the product so you inthe market, and 1 of-the best ones is V2 cigs. Lots of thecustomers consider this a consequence of morereductions Once you purchase them on line numerous sites offerdiscount by accepting V2 cigarettes promo code. Vouchers from V2 Cigs save you some money, average cigarettes you'll be able to wind updisturbing other individuals surrounding you.

So that you wont need to on these dangerous tobacco cigarettes excellent flavours and e-cigs whichcan be awesome to work with. In reality, e-cigarettes have grown to be rage among an unbelievable number seen just as oneaverage smoker when taking medical health insurance. In case you are not used to using V2 Cigs,its core kit may be battery and they will your world-wide that is free of pitch andother harmful chemical substances. V2 Cigsbrands comes with a broad selection of perplexed which is the right business to opt to get e cigarettes. Thisis because the cigarette eliminates all of the noxious materials which could enter one's Virtually all e cig users invest lot time finding the best coupons.

More Chicken Little from Alberta Action on Smoking and Health

13:17, 19/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
New survey results indicating large numbers of Alberta teenagers are hooked on flavoured tobacco products is evidence enough that the province should immediately ban the items, medical professionals and advocates said Tuesday. The supposed source for this statement was Health Canada?s 2010-2011 Youth Smoking Survey . To wit Among youth who had ever tried smoking a cigarette, 30% (about 218,000) had used at least one flavoured tobacco product in the last 30 days, compared to only 1% (about 29,000 ) of youth who had never tried smoking a cigarette. In my lexicon hooked is not quite the same as having tried something once in the last 30 days. Nor does this seem to be much of a problem if only 1% of non smokers try them (again maybe no more than once in the last 30 days). Since smokeless tobacco, which as most who read this blog know, is about 99% safer than smoking, you can argue that 1. anytime those people visit who would have smoked used smokeless instead it was a good thing and 2. there is a chance that someone who might otherwise have become a smoker gravitated towards smokeless instead and ended up with the much less harmful habit. Of course no one wants the kids do be doing any of this ? these are toys for adults. One real problem with this survey is that the flavoured tobacco category conflated smokeless tobacco with menthol cigarettes and flavoured cigars. Considering the vast harm differences between inhaling and not inhaling smoke it would be no different than having a category consisting of e-cigarettes and menthol cigarettes together. I suspect that Gerein did not read the survey which would have lead to quite a different sort of headline since the findings are that smoking (and marijuana and other drug use, and alcohol use) declined for all the groups. Isn?t that headline worthy? We can?t tell about smokeless tobacco since this was the first time that use was polled. The language throughout the article suggests it was cobbled together from a press release from Les Hagen given the antiquated but incendiary cliches the anti-nicotine groups like to use. ?Fruity spit tobacco? leads off the old argument that tobacco companies are targetting youth through the use of flavours. I have always found the implication that adults don?t like flavours odd. Humans like flavoured products. In fact, one of the things a lot of adult smokers found quite attractive about e-cigarettes, and sealed the switch, was the variety of flavours. According to the article the most commonly used flavoured tobacco product by Alberta youth were cigarrillos. This seems to occasion a ban on flavoured tobacco products in general (again lumping them with the vastly different smokeless products). The real worry then from a harm reduction perspective is that flavoured smokeless tobacco has been gaining popularity as an alternative for smokers, and as a cessation aid. As the case is with e-cigarettes, once you introduce an effective and satisfying alternative to smoking, if you then remove it, you are then encouraging people back into a riskier lifestyle choice. If we are going to ban something, why not ban groups from using public money (money from you and me) to agitate for removing healthier alternatives from the market? Finally, the Health Canada report found that almost all youth obtained their products through social sources. more.. In other words these products are not being sold to minors. I worry that if kids start liking Pernod even if they all get it from their parents that high minders will argue that it should be removed from liquor stores. On a lighter note, the SAIT student paper had a nice little article by Sarah Pynoo ? Health Canada?s E-Cig restrictions deserve to go up in smoke . As for the criticism that cigarettes could lead towards children and young adults getting hooked on actual cigarettes, it seems a bit silly. For one thing, while both regular cigarettes and e-cigarettes have a variety of flavours, both are only available with ID to those over 18. Also, it?s pretty hard to imagine a kid getting hooked on candy-flavoured, nicotine-free vapour, and switching over to the harsh, lung-burning alternative of continue an actual cigarette.
Concerns About Electric cigarette Usage With respect to Novices http://smokles.wordpress.com/2013/02/27/more-chicken-little-from-alberta-action-on-smoking-and-health/

V2 Electronic Cigarettes Get Great Reviews, But Are They Safe?

07:27, 19/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link

E Cigarette Reviewed Offer Exclusive 20% Storewide V2 Cigs Coupon Discount

However the V2 Cigs reviews have stood out above all other brands. As reported by Tech Cigarette, V2 Cigs reviews reveal that consumers are particularly happy with the pricing, flavors, product quality, and fantastic customer service . In addition to the quality and customer service, consumers are offered a 30 day money back guarantee. All factors considered, V2 electronic cigarettes have been touted as Americas #1 Electronic Cigarette Brand. But are they safe?
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.inquisitr.com/803157/v2-electronic-cigarettes-get-great-reviews-but-are-they-safe/

V2 Electronic Cigarettes The combination enables customers to get up to 36% off in totality. V2 cigs panders to a smoker's 'psychological' need to smoke along with satiating their nicotine addiction. With state-of-the-art techniques and an eclectic range of flavors to choose from, V2 Cigs v2 cigarette review has reached a higher list of satisfied customers than most of its major competitions. E Cigarette Reviewed regularly offers coupons eligible for deduction for all the brands that makes it on their Top 10 list.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://finance.yahoo.com/news/e-cigarette-reviewed-offer-exclusive-215500861.html

Another Day, Another E-Cigarette Opponent Fabricates Evidence to Deter Use; This Time, It's the World Health Organization

01:02, 19/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
...Providing the whole story behind tobacco news. Monday, July 08, 2013 Another Day, Another E-Cigarette Opponent Fabricates Evidence to Deter Use; This Time, It's the World Health Organization Hardly a day has gone by during the last week in which an electronic cigarette opponent has failed to fabricate evidence to deter the use of this product. First, it was a physician who stated that lung damage can occur due to temperatures of thousands of degrees, then it was a physician who stated that nicotine delivery is much higher in e-cigarettes than real ones. Today, I report that the World Health Organization has fabricated a new piece of evidence that is completely false and has no basis in reality: that cigarettes are safer than e-cigarettes because unlike e-cigarettes they have a filter so the nicotine does not go directly to the lungs. As first reported by Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos on his electronic cigarette research blog : "In an unprecedented statement on http://WhiteSmokeReview.com volt pack e cig Philippines national television, Dr Florante Trinidad, technical officer at ?Tobacco-Free Initiative?-WHO Western Pacific Region, suggested that electronic cigarettes are more dangerous than tobacco . He [stated]: ?The most dangerous thing about this product (e-cigarette) is that the nicotine goes directly to the lungs while regular cigarettes have a filter. With this delivery device the nicotine goes directly to the lungs.?" Dr. Faraslinos goes on to argue that: "This is a previously-unheard statement. For the first time, a WHO official is publicly and directly suggesting to e-cigarette users (vapers) that it is safer to go back to tobacco cigarettes. Everyone who has seen this video got the same impression. The biggest issue is that this statement is scientifically false, misleading and dangerous for the health of e-cigarette users who may be intimidated and relapse to smoking." In analyzing the validity of the WHO's statement, Dr. Farsalinos concludes that only one aspect of the statement is true: cigarettes do indeed have a filter. But everything else is fabricated: "in experienced consumers who were using advanced e-cigarette devices, nicotine levels in blood were elevated; .. [read more] still they were much lower than the levels found after smoking. In fact, scientists believe that nicotine delivery and absorption from e-cigarette should be increased so that they become more effective in smoking abstinence. The WHO official says the exact opposite. Is this because he prefers people to smoke rather than substitute tobacco with the much safer e-cigarettes?" The Rest of the Story The World Health Organization's fabrication is not only damaging because it is false, but because it could well lead to smokers deciding to continue using their deadly cigarettes instead of switching to far less harmful e-cigarettes. Or even worse, it could lead to ex-smokers who have quit via e-cigarettes returning to cigarette smoking. The statement is completely irresponsible and is tantamount to committing medical malpractice on a global scale. Moreover, the WHO's statement is irresponsible because it suggests to the public that the filter in cigarettes conveys a degree of safety. If the cigarette companies were to say the same thing, they would find themselves in the courtroom the following day. Yet the World Health Organization can apparently commit scientific fraud with impunity. This story, considered in light of the previous ones of the same nature, demonstrates the level to which electronic cigarette opponents have sunk. The arguments against a device that is helping millions of smokers to quit or to substantially cut down and to possibly save their lives are so weak that these opponents can only argue against the devices by fabricating evidence. Posted by
Novice Clarifications On Commonplace Electronic Cigarette Questions http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/07/another-day-another-e-cigarette.html

E-cigarettes an emerging alternative

13:13, 18/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link

The flavor part of it is particularly troubling because that kills the taste, said Drea. That could appeal to young people. Bans, taxes Illinois Department of Public Health spokeswoman Melaney Arnold said in an email state and federal laws do not restrict where e-cigarettes can be used. The statewide smoking ban in Illinois took effect in January 2008. E-cigarettes remain in a regulatory haze in Illinois.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.sj-r.com/top-stories/x946752095/E-cigarettes-an-emerging-alteratnive

RI gov vetoes electronic cigarette legislation

-- Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee has vetoed legislation to ban the sale of electronic cigarettes to children, saying the way it was written would have exempted e-cigarettes from laws governing tobacco products. In his veto message on Wednesday, Chafee said children should not be allowed to buy electronic cigarettes. But he said the legislation would have defined them as "vapor products," so they would not be subject to the regulation, enforcement, licensing and taxation laws that govern tobacco. http://healthcigarettes.net/ The legislation was pushed by Democratic Majority Leader Dominick Ruggerio, who said when he introduced it that it was modeled on a bill introduced in Wyoming.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.cnbc.com/id/100896763

Rhode Island Anti-Smoking Groups Lobbying Against Ban on Electronic Cigarette Sales to Minors

12:11, 18/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
...Providing the whole story behind tobacco news. Thursday, July 11, 2013 Rhode Island Anti-Smoking Groups Lobbying Against Ban on Electronic Cigarette Sales to Minors Normally, public health groups support policies that protect the public's health. But in today's Rest of the Story, I reveal that one public health coalition is pushing a policy that would harm children by potentially allowing them easy access to electronic cigarettes. A coalition of anti-smoking groups in Rhode Island, including the American Lung Association, American Cancer Society, and American Heart Association, is urging Governor Chafee to veto legislation passed by the Rhode Island House and Senate which would ban the sale of electronic cigarettes to minors. According to an article in the Providence Journal: "Banning the use of e-cigarettes by minors should be the sort of legislation antismoking groups support. Instead they are calling for a veto." "On July 1, two visit website days [link] before the General Assembly ended its 2013 session, state lawmakers passed a bill prohibiting persons under the age of 18 from using or purchasing e-cigarettes and other ?vapor products? that heat liquid nicotine into a smokable vapor. But a coalition that includes some of Rhode Island?s largest health advocacy groups calls the bill a ?stalking horse? for tobacco and e-cigarette companies that want to exempt the growing industry from the regulations and taxes imposed on traditional tobacco-based products." The Rest of the Story Why would any public health group want to work to ensure that youth have free access to electronic cigarettes? There is no legitimate public health justification for such a position. However, there is a possible political explanation. These anti-smoking groups, which have an ideological opposition to electronic cigarettes because they look like cigarettes, don't want the electronic cigarette companies to be painted as responsible companies that have supported actions to prevent youth access to their product. Instead, they would prefer that youth do have access because if large numbers of youths do start using these products, then they can successfully argue for a ban on electronic cigarettes. If youth continue to avoid these products (as they are now), it will be difficult for these organizations to convince policy makers that they should ban the products or put severe obstacles in their way (such as high taxes or stifling regulation of their sales or marketing). In other words, these groups are using the health of children as a political pawn in their lobbying efforts to protect tobacco products and Big Pharma products from competition from electronic cigarettes. In my opinion, public health groups shouldn't play games like this. Posted by
Frequently Posed Concerns Relating to Smokeless cigarettes http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/07/rhode-island-anti-smoking-groups.html

Electronic Cigarette Company Launches New Website

01:01, 18/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link

Vapor Hale LLC "After smoking cigarettes and dipping snuff for 14 years - quitting many times in between, I finally quit cold turkey by using an Electronic Cigarette. Its been 8 months http://www.ecigchic.com/ since I kicked the habit. For years I would tell myself I was going to "Quit Smoking" just to pick right back up where I left http://v2cigs-couponcode.com/5-pack-v2-disposables/ off.... And then some! I'm not one for gimmicks.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/electronic-cigarette-company-launches-new-website-352994.php

Unethical Soup

00:00, 18/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
The Truth About Nicotine It is widely believed that nicotine causes cancer and heart disease. But it is visit our website other ingredients in tobacco smoke--not nicotine--that cause these. In fact, nicotine is an extremely image source effective treatment for several disease conditions, and can prevent a number of other serious, debilitating diseases. It is not lack of willpower but rather nicotine's "wonder-drug" qualities that prevent so redirected many smokers from being able to quit.
Queries Relating To Electronic Cigarette Use For Beginners http://nicotinetruth.blogspot.com/2010/07/unethical-soup.html

Which Brand of E-Cig is the Best?

23:53, 17/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
There is a lot of debate about which brands of electronic cigarette s is the best. There are many different brands of electronic cigarette s e cigarette discount codes that use various types of e-juice. One of the most popular brands of e-cigs is V2 electronic cigarette s. Users have been singing the praises about this brand of electronic cigarettes . V2 Cigs offers a vast variety of option that simply will blow our mind. This brand of electronic cigarettes has been high praised in user reviews and in professional reviews.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/which-brand-of-e-cig-is-the-best/

E Cigarette Safety

18:22, 16/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
Perhaps one of the most controversial gadgets today is the official website electronic cigarette . These electronic cigarette s, or also more commonly referred to as e-cigarettes or e-cigs, are considered to be by some as the best alternative to smoking. Are Electronic Cigarettes Safe To Use? With the e-cigarettes, it?s like you don?t completely stop smoking, but you?re living a healthier lifestyle at the same time. E-cigs first originated in China, and was sold in the Chinese market in 2005. Within two years, the e-cigarettes became so famous that even the American market took notice of this promising product.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/e-cigarette-safety/

The American Cancer Society?s Anti-Tobacco Campaign Ignores Its Own Research

15:27, 16/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
Tobacco Truth Helping smokers avoid risks is a legitimate goal of tobacco control. But the movement has morphed into an anti-tobacco crusade intent on demonizing both tobacco users and the industry supplying them. This blog examines and comments on the scientific foundation for tobacco policies and fallacies. Thursday, April 18, 2013 The American Cancer Society?s Anti-Tobacco Campaign Ignores Its Own Research The American Cancer Society continues to misinform smokers about vastly safer options.† With chapters in nearly every county across the nation, the ACS is a powerful tobacco harm reduction opponent. Since it cannot argue against tobacco harm reduction on the facts, the ACS resorts to false and deceptive claims.† For example, last week the House Consumer Protection Committee of the Illinois General Assembly scheduled a hearing on tobacco harm reduction.† Heather Eagleton, Illinois Director of Public Policy and Government Relations for the ACS Cancer Action Network, issued a press release replete with false statements; it was reported in a popular capitol blog that previewed the event ( here ). False Statement 1.† ?This is a new twist on the old tobacco marketing campaigns of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s that falsely promised health benefits to be derived from filtered, ?light?, and ?less tar? tobacco product alternatives that were ?more safe? versus ?less safe.? These ?harm reduction? messages were false then and are false now.? Ms. Eagleton is apparently unaware that the ACS was responsible for some of the ?false promises.?† In 1976 ( here )† and in 1979 ( here ), the organization documented and promoted the health advantages of light cigarettes compared with http://WhiteSmokeReview.com Smokeless image Cigarettes Complaints full-flavor brands.† The ACS president said in the latter year that ?findings of the new study suggest a way for smokers to reduce their lung cancer risk by switching to low tar-nicotine cigarettes if they find it impossible to quit entirely.? False Statement 2.† ?There is research, however, to show these products cause cancer of the mouth, pancreas and esophagus, as well as other serious health conditions.? This is a completely false assertion by Ms. Eagleton.† It ignores the 2009 results of the most comprehensive analysis of relevant research (discussed here ).† More importantly, Ms. Eagleton ignores research from her own organization.† In 2005, ACS investigators published results from the first and second Cancer Prevention Studies (abstract here ), two of the largest studies of smokeless tobacco use and deaths in the U.S.† Here are the visit site ACS-reported noteworthy risks for smokeless tobacco users: Relative Risks (95% Confidence Interval) of Death From Selected Diseases Among Smokeless Tobacco Users in the American Cancer Society?s Cancer Prevention Studies (CPS) Disease
Some Regular Concerns About Electric cigarettes http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-american-cancer-societys-anti.html

The Truth About E-liquid And Your Health

06:14, 16/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
Since its introduction, vaping with electronic cigarette s has become more and more popular. For the past 10 years, the number of people other who continue to smoke with obsolete tobacco cigarettes has been in steady decline. Simultaneously, the number of people who enjoy clean, fresh nicotine vapor produced by electronic cigarette s has increased. † How is vaping with e- cigs different? † One very big difference between smoking obsolete tobacco cigarettes and vaping with electronic cigarettes is the e-liquid. This is also sometimes called liquid nicotine or E juice.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/the-truth-about-e-liquid-and-your-health/

Why do vapers still believe Big Tobacco is 'evil?'

03:10, 16/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Friday, April 27, 2012 Why do vapers still believe Big Tobacco is 'evil?' With the recent announcement from Blu Electronic Cigarettes that it has been sold to Lorillard Tobacco company , panic seems to be spreading through the e-cigarette community. Many vapers seem to harbor a hatred for "Big Tobacco" and have expressed disgust, outrage, distrust and fear that the industry will now turn e-cigarettes into what they were trying to escape. Here are some personal thoughts about the situation that I posted on a community forum, in response to comments that Big Tobacco was not to be trusted with e-cigarettes: Are any of u planning on buying any† pv †hardware or liquids from a company that has previously tried to knowingly kill us????? How on earth could we ever trust that they would sell us the best that is available? Do you still buy products from the automobile industry? Did you know the automobile industry knew that seat belts and air bags would save lives, yet fought having them be mandatory in cars? Or they knew for 30 years about the problem of spontaneous acceleration, yet covered it up and continues to deny it? Do you still buy medications - both prescription and over the counter? Yet everyone has heard of the myriad of denials and cover ups made over the years by Big Pharma - Chantix, Avandia, Paxil - were all killing people and BP lied, denied and hide the facts. Still, people do not claim BP knowingly tried to kill people. The denials and cover up of "Big Tobacco" were no different or worse than any of those perpetrated by other industries, yet they are still vilified while other companies get a free pass time and again. The fact is, while smoking is highly dangerous, it doesn't kill every user or even most users; there are more people today who have quit smoking than smoke and anyone who has ever smoked cannot pretend that they didn't feel the negative effects of smoking on their body and believed it was still good for them or perfectly safe. Those tobacco executives who participated in that cover up and denial are long gone. It's a well-known fact that smoking can be bad for you and has been since the 1950's, but so are a lot of other things that are sold to people today. It's fully informed, personal choice now whether or not to take the risk and has been for some time. It was well known in the 1980's when I made the choice to start smoking - whether the tobacco companies admitted it was addictive or not. The tobacco companies weren't knowingly "trying to kill" me, because I shouldn't have started smoking in the first place. Now the question becomes, will they be "smart" with their purchase and marketing plan... If so, and if they do not re-introduce all of the "nasty" things that are in the good old analogs, they could have something here.† I would not mind purchasing supplies from them as long as I know they are not trying to kill me like the normal smokes will. I also would be concerned about pricing and the fact that it might go up. I guess it depends on how much the government wants to step in on this and how much "pocket padding" BT is willing to pay to make this work. Because of the general mistrust of tobacco companies, Lorillard has to know it will their website be under extreme scrutiny - something other e-cigarette companies haven't had to deal with...yet. If anything, Lorillard will be motivated to produce the cleanest, safest e-liquid possible because of that scrutiny - and they'll probably promote that fact. (From my understanding, the deal with Johnson Creek is not going to end anytime soon anyhow.) Additionally, unlike with tobacco - which has thousands of NATURAL ingredients within which to hide the toxic additives people believe are added to cigarettes - it would be very difficult to add toxic chemicals to something that basically has only 3 or 4 "generally regarded as safe" ingredients without being discovered. As far as prices, Lorillard has the ability to make much larger purchases and negotiate prices with manufacturers - which will help them compete and keep prices low. I'm sure they are well aware that the high costs of regular cigarettes, a lot due to taxation, is partly why people quit smoking or switch to e-cigarettes and keeping the cost low is a strong selling point. It also gives them incentive to fight unjustified sin taxes on e-cigarettes - something that will benefit the industry as a whole. The whole point of e-cigarettes for most people are low health risks and low price. It would be counter-productive for Lorillard to buy into the industry and remove those two greater incentives. It would be like large food company buying a popular and successful organic health food company and changing all of the ingredients to be non-organic and full of preservatives, fat and sugar. Why would anyone buy their product then?? It just wouldn't make sense. There is the risk that Lorillard will try to negotiate with the FDA (like Philip Morris did with the FSPTCA), resulting in regulations that could essentially wipe out anything other than a blu-style device, pre-filled cartos and tobacco flavors and acquiesce sin taxes and public use bans. I can guess that CASAA would NOT support that! I hope they truly understand how vapers are a different breed - we won't go quietly into the night like we did as smokers. Lorillard needs to understand that they have a really great market with the starter vapers and don't need to destroy the cottage companies that specialize in the upgrade devices and boutique liquids. They will see a lot of consumer backlash if they attempt to move against those types of products and I will be out front leading the charge if I have to! I don't know, this really bothers me. We all know BT has spent countless hours of research and ungodly amounts of money to make their products as addictive as possible. I have no doubt that they won't stoop that low now, and then we're back to square one again (IMHO) They'd be enslaving people to their all new product. I†believe that vaping is much safer than smoking but I don't want them dipping their dirty corrupt fingers in my juice and messing with my brain chemistry again. I just feel like we'd be stepping backwards and lose some of the benefits we've all gained by getting away from them *sigh* Remember when opposition started coming out against e-cigarettes and everyone assumed it was big, evil tobacco trying to eliminate the competition? Remember how shocked we all were that it wasn't Big Tobacco, but all of the health groups who we thought would now be happy that we didn't smoke anymore? Remember how interesting it was to find out that so many of those opposing health groups were in the pocket of Big Pharma? Now think of this: Once it was obvious e-cigarettes were here to stay, either Big Pharma or Big Tobacco were bound to get into the e-cigarette industry. It was inevitable. Which would you trust more to handle that business now? An industry which was called out 30 years click here. ago for refusing to admit what everyone already knew anyhow - that smoking wasn't good for you and was potentially addicting; has made attempts to create safer products for its consumers; is under great public scrutiny and is sympathetic to people who want to use tobacco/nicotine products recreationally and without being vilified and ostracized by society? Original Artwork: Mike Keefe, The Denver Post Or an industry that has secretly been behind all of the lies about e-cigarettes and smokeless alternatives; lied to get smokers/vapers banned from just about everywhere; financially supported groups that made smokers, tobacco users and nicotine users social pariahs in order to guilt them into buying their gums and patches and increase their profits; lied about and/or hid the relative safety of smoke-free alternatives (effectively killing millions of smokers who would have otherwise switched); perpetuated the "quit or die" standard in order to sell more gums and patches and increase their profits; lied and/or hid the dangerous effects of Chantix; lied and/or hid the fact that NRT are highly ineffective, yet continue to tell people they are "safe and effective, so use them instead of smoke-free alternatives," which is effectively keeping smokers smoking (and endangering their health) every time the gums and patches fail? You could say "neither," but then all you would be left with the e-cigarette industry, which is unorganized, unregulated, fly-by-night; has largely refused to step up and implement the most basic manufacturing and ethical sales standards in nearly 10 years; has been largely MIA in the fight against bans, taxes and sales restrictions and has only one representative organization that is apparently willing to throw everyone else under the bus to make their business model of the pre-filled, tobacco flavored carto the FDA standard. It baffles me how vapers continue to see Big Tobacco as some inherently untrustworthy and unethical entity knowing what Big Pharma and the ANTZ groups have perpetrated over the past 30 years - lying and covering up the facts- at the expense of public health, in order to make a billions in profits. Especially since it was the ANTZ who have worked tirelessly to provide the "evidence" to demonize the tobacco industry in the eyes of the public (for doing exactly the same thing) and giving smokers a reason not to hold themselves accountable for their own actions. Think about it - everything you know, all of the evidence about Big Tobacco, came from the same people who are now telling the public that "Big E-cigarettes" are targeting kids with the tasty flavors that no adult would use; contain anti-freeze, other toxic chemicals and carcinogens; are possibly more addicting than cigarettes; that vapers are just underhandedly trying to circumvent smoking bans and their vapor could be harmful to bystanders, so the industry is lobbying legislators to keep it legal to use publicly. They are twisting the facts, exaggerating, guessing and even telling outright lies to protect their profits. Doesn't that make you the least bit suspicious about what they've been telling you about Big Tobacco? Opinions posted on this blog are those solely of the author(s) and do not represent the opinon, views or policy of any organization or company with which the author(s) may be otherwise associated. Posted by
Questions About Electric cigarette Use With respect to Rookies http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-do-vapers-still-believe-big-tobacco.html

E-cigarettes: the new fracking

21:38, 15/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link

More Kids Using E-Cigarettes

But there are plenty of reasons to fear this is just another way to keep people addicted to the smoking industry, period. The Globe recently reported that Boston has issued 61 store permits to sell e-cigarettes since March, five times more than in the same period last year. The explosion is no coincidence. In recent months, an industry dominated by small entrepreneurs has been joined by Altria, RJ Reynolds, and Lorillard. They are getting in the game before the Food and Drug Administration can regulate them and while the medical community is divided between doctors who believe e-cigarettes should be part of harm reduction strategies to curb tobacco smoking and those who feel that no new type of smoking of any kind should be encouraged.
For the original version including any supplementary images http://v2cigs-couponcode.com/review-about-v2-cigs/ or video, visit http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/columns/2013/07/13/cigarettes-new-fracking/e2rSt4qaPg6Ns6bWCyedUI/story.html

How much do Electronic Cigarettes Cost? Tech-Cigarette Throws Light on this Situation

Tech-Cigarette ( EMAILWIRE.COM , July 15, 2013 ) Dallas, Texas -- Tech-Cigarette.com offers comments on how much do electronic cigarettes cost , as this information is very important for helping smokers to achieve their smoke related goals v2 cigs electronic cigarette review with utmost ease. The price of electronic cigarettes is of vital importance as without that the budget conscious smokers would never really be able to figure out how they can manage to taste the best smokeless cigarettes without disrupting their monthly budgets in any way. As per Tech-Cigarette spokespersons, The cost of electronic cigarettes varies from brand to brand, nonetheless, almost all the top brands offer their starter kits well within the $100 range. In case, you wish to opt for a high end starter kit, then you may need to pay $50 extra, which implies that you would get the best possible starter kit that has all the goodies within the $160 mark. It also needs to be noticed that the refill of an e cigarette costs a meager $2.00 or at the maximum $3.00 (for high end versions) on an average, whereas a pack of regular cigarettes (which in turn is equivalent to a pack of regular cigarettes), costs $6.00 on an average.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.emailwire.com/release/127796-How-much-do-Electronic-Cigarettes-Cost-TechCigarette-Throws-Light-on-this-Situation.html

Its still nicotine and its not FDA approved or regulated. So we really do not know what are in them, said Garrett. Garrett says companies are blatantly targeting kids with wacky flavors any kid would like. Chocolate, Apple, and orange soda flavors top the list.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.abc4.com/content/news/top_stories/story/More-Kids-Using-E-Cigarettes/BOJX12ivm0ikA3kN9wjsNA.cspx

The Price of Electronic Cigarettes

18:07, 15/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
Some consumers only buy a product based on how much that it costs. Other consumers are willing to pay more for a higher quality product. The same applies when purchasing an electronic cigarette . There are many different brands available to choose from, but some brands will cost more than others. Electronic cigarette s are not expensive no matter which brand that you ultimately choose. When compared to traditional link tobacco products, electronic cigarettes will always be the more affordable option.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/the-price-of-electronic-cigarettes/

The ANTZ smoking rate shell game

12:12, 15/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Sunday, February 3, 2013 The ANTZ smoking rate shell game In 1990, the number of smokers was 45.8 million (25.5%). The Surgeon General announced the goal of reducing the smoking rate to 15% by 2000. Cigarette Smoking Among Adults -- United States, 1990 By 2000, the number of smokers was 46.5 million (an increase of 700,000 smokers) but the "prevalence" or "rate" (percentage of adults smoking) was "reduced" to 23.3%. The ANTZ claimed their efforts were working - because the smoking rate was reduced from 25.5% to 23.3% - but they needed billions more in funding because the goal of 15% was still not reached. So a goal of a 12% smoking rate was set for 2010. Cigarette Smoking Among Adults --- United States, 2000 A decade later, the number of smokers in 2010 was "down" again from 46.5 million (23.3%) to 45.3 million, a smoking rate of 19.3%. The ANTZ could now say their "quit or die" policy and spending billions on getting tax increases, youth education, flavor bans and smoking bans was working, because the 1990 smoking rate of 25.5% was "significantly reduced" to 19.3%. Now they need billions more to reach that convincingly-attainable goal of 12% by 2020. CDC - Fact Sheet - Adult Cigarette Smoking in the United States - Smoking & Tobacco Use Of course, they didn't mention that the 25.5% in 1990 and 19.3% in 2010 were virtually the same in the number of smokers - 45.5 million in 1990 and 45.3 million in 2010. That's a reduction of only 200,000 in 20 years! Furthermore, the CDC reported 419,000 deaths attributed to smoking in 1990. In 2010, the number of "smoking-related" deaths was reported as 443,000 (unchanged in reports since http://WhiteSmokeReview.com most vapor cartomizer 2004,) a 5.4% increase from 1990's smoking-related deaths. Vital Signs: Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults Aged ?18 Years --- United States, 2005--2010 There is absolutely no way that the CDC, FDA and ANTZ do not know these facts and are not knowingly deceiving the public about their "proven click here! and effective" policies and medical treatments for smoking; to continue fleecing and ostracizing tobacco-using taxpayers by convincing the public that what they are doing works. In reality, population growth probably contributed more to the reduction in the smoking rate in the past 20 years than anti-smoking efforts. Most of the real drops in smoking rates, due to people actually quitting, happened before most of the draconian policies started in the late 1980's and early 90's. The introduction of a product that actually does reduce the smoking rates, such as electronic cigarettes, must horrify them, as it renders their shell game of misdirecting smoking quit rates useless. Posted by
Questions About Electronic Cigarette Use For Beginners http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-antz-smoking-rate-shell-game.html

Citing danger, PMA urges e-cigarettes ban

09:30, 15/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link

E-cigarettes an emerging alteratnive

PMA President Dr. Leo Olarte urged the President to direct Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) Secretary Manuel ''Mar'' Roxas II to seriously study the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Advisory 2013-008 and FDA Advisory 2013-015 and finally ban the sale of electronic cigarettes in the Philippines. He cited the warning issued by WHO Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) and Mental Health Cluster Assistant Director General Ala Alwan that electronic cigarettes are not considered as legitimate therapy to stop smoking addiction. ''We urgently appeal to President Benigno S. Aquino III and his government to immediately address this new but clear and present danger of electronic cigarettes to the health of the nation most especially our children.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://ph.news.yahoo.com/citing-danger-pma-urges-e-cigarettes-ban-165236341.html

Were waiting on FDA, said Drea. She said a major association concern is that e-cigarettes simply reinforce a smokers addiction to nicotine. There also are concerns the flavored products attract http://v2cigs-couponcode.com/the-handy-v2-shorty-cig-100mm/ the young. The flavor part of it is particularly troubling because that kills the taste, said Drea.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.sj-r.com/top-stories/x946752095/E-cigarettes-an-emerging-alteratnive

Electronic cigarettes could rekindle battles over smoking in public

Still, Jamnick said he felt uncomfortable vaping (the e-cigarette term for lighting up). Its been, what, six years now since they passed the smoking ban in Minnesota? he said. You give it a funny look because you havent seen it in a while. Electronic cigarettes have been v2 cigs on a slow burn for years, but theyve recently caught fire. National sales jumped to $500 million in 2012 and are projected to clear $1 billion this year. In the Twin Cities, at least a dozen e-cigarette specialty shops have opened and shop owners say the growing business will likely see a boost from the $1.60-a-pack tobacco tax hike, which went into effect July 1.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/215258211.html

Disposable Electronic Cigarette: 3 Important Questions

05:53, 15/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
The disposable electronic cigarette is commonly a little longer than traditional tobacco cigarettes and can be used right out of the box.† It is gaining popularity among smokers primarily due to the increased attention to the negative health impacts of traditional tobacco cigarettes , which has been linked to more than 4,000 types of carcinogens, toxins, and poisonous chemicals.† The good news is that these devices are capable of delivering the same level of gratification that smokers have been used to. This device contains a cartridge that has a nicotine solution that is connected to a heating element that is powered by a pre-charged battery.† Smokers do not even have to look far to enjoy the kind of satisfaction that this device can deliver, because they are widely available in different convenience stores across the country.† Many sectors are actually pushing for these devices to be recognized as excellent alternatives to dangerous traditional tobacco cigarettes.† To get a better appreciation of the disposable electronic cigarette , let us tackle these questions. What are the benefits provided by these disposable types of e-cigarettes? Pricing is one of the perceived benefits associated with these types of electronic cigarettes.† However, it is good to understand that prices can actually be affected by the kinds of taxes being imposed in your locality.† In general though, smokers may find the disposable electronic cigarette as a relatively fair deal, especially when you consider that one device is equivalent to roughly two packs of traditional tobacco cigarettes. With this kind of service life, smokers will get the distinct benefit of trying out the delivery system of electronic cigarettes before committing to invest in starter kit s.† Aside from the pricing benefit, it is also equally important to point out the ingredients that go into the nicotine solution or sometime referred to as e-juice.† The main component of the solution, amazing as it may sound is actually water, which is a stark contrast to the extremely hazardous compounds in traditional tobacco cigarettes. The functionality of electronic cigarettes allows it to produce vapor.† Before you can get vapor, you need liquid more that can be heated enough to make it change its state.† Water is not only the most abundant, but practically the cheapest type of liquid available, that can be used for this purpose.† Propylene glycol is another ingredient that is popularly used in other products such as cosmetics and cough syrups, which means it is relatively safe for use, just like water.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/disposable-electronic-cigarette-3-important-questions/

Censorship by the Norwegian Health Directorate

23:12, 14/7/2013 .. 0 comments .. Link
Tobacco Truth Helping smokers avoid risks is a legitimate goal of tobacco control. But the movement has morphed into an anti-tobacco crusade intent on demonizing both tobacco users and the industry supplying them. This blog examines and comments on the scientific foundation for tobacco policies and fallacies. Friday, July 5, 2013 Censorship by the Norwegian Health Directorate Global health authorities have zero tolerance for tobacco use. Worse, they have zero tolerance for any rational discussion of tobacco harm reduction.† Last year, the health directorate of Norway, which, like Sweden, has benefitted from snus-driven tobacco harm reduction (discussed here and here ), removed an invited commentary from the Norwegian Health Directorate?s prevention website, http://www.forebygging.no/ . The commentary was written by Dr. Lars Erik Rutqvist, former professor at the Karolinska Institute and now senior vice president for scientific affairs at Swedish Match.† He is a highly respected Swedish scientist and expert on tobacco harm reduction. In April 2012, a column by Dr. Rutqvist on using snus as a means to quit smoking appeared in the Norwegian national newspaper Aftenposten.† Subsequently, the Health Directorate invited him to write an expanded piece, which they published on their prevention site in June.† Two months later, the piece was erased from the site. †† Dr. Rutqvist described the obvious censorship in an interview with a Norwegian financial newspaper in September: ?I got a call from the [prevention website] editor who explained that the Norwegian Directorate of Health wanted the article removed.† I`ve been working with research and have written debate contributions for many years. Never have I come across anything like this. It is quite strange for the Directorate of Health to censor what a specialist website regards as good.? The Health Directorate?s censorship is appalling.† I asked Dr. Rutqvist for an English translation of his blacklisted commentary.† It is outstanding and deserves wide circulation.† It appears unedited below. Sacrificing lives for the sake of morals Opponents of snus are dominating the Norwegian snus debate by manipulating facts, which are shoddy at best and fatally immoral at worst. Discussion of snus in Norway is characterised by a debate where the end justifies the means and where the facts are manipulated to make snus look far more harmful than it is. In this debate there are several key questions: Is snus carcinogenic? †Can snus help people stop smoking? †Is it immoral to recommend snus to those who want to give up cigarettes? One example: The usually meticulous Norwegian Institute of Public Health recently issued a report claiming that using snus as an adolescent increases the likelihood of starting to smoke.† The basis for this was an interview of adolescents first in 2001 followed by another interview in 2004, the purpose of which was to track how their habits evolved. †Of the only 90 (!) persons that the Institute chose to present as a representative sample to draw conclusions from regarding snus, 25 had started to smoke casually. †Almost just as many ? 22 ? had quit snus altogether. So, you could just as easily conclude that it is just as likely for snus users to quit snus as it is for them to start smoking ? yet this is not stated in the report. When, added to that, there is so small a sample such a categorical conclusion can only be politically motivated. †Besides, there are a number of reports, including from SIRUS [Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research] and the EU [European Union], that conclude that snus is the way out of smoking, and not the way in. Is snus carcinogenic? The reason why snus is so controversial is that it contains tobacco, among other things. Tobacco in itself is so negatively charged that just discussing it is a problem. Few to none of the Norwegian politicians or experts want to appear overwhelmingly positive about snus, so those who are after banning it often get to dominate the arena by playing with the facts. Let?s look at some facts: Snus is a pleasure product, and should be used in moderation. Nicotine in all forms, meaning snus along with pharmaceutical products containing nicotine, should be avoided during pregnancy. †There is scientific agreement that nicotine affects the development of the foetus. †It is also a known fact that nicotine affects blood pressure. On the other hand, the existence of a connection between snus and cancer that is supported by science is nothing but a myth. †On the contrary, the past 30 years of research shows that it is the burning process in cigarette smoke that causes the well-documented relationship between cigarettes and cancer. †There is no burning involved in the process of using snus, which is why snus gives no indications in generally accepted lab tests that measure cancer risks associated with chemical substances.† Neither have epidemiological studies been able to conclude any real increase in the risk of any form of cancer, including oral external link cancer, cancer of the oesophagus or pancreatic cancer. †Yet despite the lack of a scientific basis, snus opponents gladly shout about cancer risks, most probably because just the word ?cancer? is enough to stir up negative associations. Although there are traces of substances classified as carcinogenic (such as nitrosamines) in the tobacco used in snus, the levels are so far below WHO?s [World Health Organization] recommended limits that snus is not so different from any of the usual food products for which the regulating authorities have specified values in terms of undesired substances. That some epidemiological studies have indicated a marginal increase in risk for snus users fails to establish a pattern, and goes further in proving randomness or methodical errors than anything else. †It is a huge problem that in a number of these studies, the effects of smoking are confused with the alleged effects of snus use. One of the reasons for this is that a number of snus users today have previously been smokers. †If any of them gets cancer, is it because of smoking or is it because of snus? †Because the risk of cancer from smoking can manifest itself long after you?ve quit, it is easy to mistakenly see snus as the cause. There is therefore a huge gap between what is presented as fact in Norway, and the results we?re finding through scientific studies. In June this year, the Norwegian scientist and doctor, Tom K. Grimsrud said to the Cancer Registry for women?s portal, Kvinneguiden: ??Based on what we know today, snus seems to have many of the same harmful effects as smoking.? And Professor Maja-Lisa LÝchen went even further to say to VG in April: ??Snus also increases the risk of dying of a heart attack, and the risk of three serious forms of cancer; oral cancer, cancer of the oesophagus and pancreatic cancer. †The risk of getting these types of cancer is almost the same as if you smoke?? These claims are so grossly misrepresentative and false that Grimsrud and LÝchen appear to be completely ignorant of the scientific literature available on the subject. †In the scientific community it is generally known that snus is at least 90 per cent less harmful than cigarettes, as determined by the EU?s own health authorities, SCENIHR [Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks] and the Royal College of Physicians in London. †Any real connection with oral cancer, cancer of the oesophagus and pancreatic cancer cannot be found if looking at cumulative research in the field, and not just presenting marginal risk increases from a few studies, which seems to be LÝchen?s modus operandi. †At the same time, it is quite clear that snus does not result in any increased risk for heart attacks. Yet despite the scientific facts, snus opponents keep on talking about the conceivable health risks. †Such allegations ironically enough lead to more people continuing to smoke, in essence - the exact opposite of what we want. What does science say? Already as far back as 2001, SCENIHR concluded that snus is not carcinogenic and that there is no connection between Swedish snus and oral cancer. †The same conclusion was carried forward in 2008. †This conclusion was also the basis for removing the cancer warning from snus boxes in 2003. The alleged connection between smoke-free tobacco and pancreatic cancer was rejected in 2011 by a major international study composed of a team of renowned scientists from 12 different universities (PanC4). †The team claimed that earlier Scandinavian studies, whose purpose it was to prove a connection, had not conducted their analyses in a scientifically correct manner which compromises the results of those studies. This rejection was no great surprise, because the claim is based on an old study which proposed a marginal increase in a rare form of cancer among a group of smokers and snus users. †This could also help explain the Swedish results since there is a clear connection between smoking and pancreatic cancer. Still, in the debate it is often stated that WHO has classified snus as a carcinogen. †This is an extreme case of oversimplifying the facts. †It is correct that WHO finds there to be a connection between smoke-free tobacco and cancer; nor is this any big surprise. †Several African and Asian varieties of smoke-free tobacco, which have far more users than the Swedish variety, are extremely carcinogenic. †The concentration of certain chemical substances can be thousands of times the levels found in Swedish snus, which are currently well below WHO?s recommended levels. †Several of the Indian and African smoke-free products contain highly carcinogenic substances that are not found in Swedish snus. The simple truth of the matter is that the uniquely low http://WhiteSmokeReview.com no7 ecig levels of undesired substances in Swedish snus have been put forward in scientific reports, including from WHO, as an example of what it is possible to achieve if you want to make a product of the highest possible quality and the lowest possible risk. Can snus help people stop smoking? So, when you know how much less harmful Swedish snus is compared to cigarettes, it begs the question: Can snus be an effective way to get people to stop smoking? In 2008, 30 per cent of Norwegian youth in the 16 to 24 age group were smokers, of which 16 per cent were regular smokers. †According to Statistics Norway, currently 11 per cent of this group are smokers. †This positive trend can naturally be attributed to the fact that knowledge of the harmful effects of cigarettes has become a matter of course for youngsters. †But, this picture is complemented by snus. †Because in the same period this age group also shows an increased use of snus; from 11 per cent being daily users in 2008 to 18 per cent in 2011. Regardless of personal beliefs about snus; if this trend continues fewer are at risk of contracting lung cancer and other cigarette-related forms of cancer in Norway. It is also interesting to observe that tobacco habits in Norway today are evolving in the same way as they did in Sweden in the 70s. †Total consumption remains constant, but the way in which tobacco is used is changing. †Snus is growing in popularity while smoking is shrinking. †Swedish men, which represent the largest group of long-term snus users, have among the lowest occurrence of cancer in Europe. In science, replacing smoking with snus is called ?Harm Reduction.? †You continue to use nicotine but reduce its harmful effects. †Some find this to be immoral. †Their utter hatred for anything and everything called tobacco blinds them to finding effective alternatives for reducing the impact on public health that the fatal cigarette represents. Both observational studies and controlled clinical trials show clearly that snus is an effective means to stop smoking. †The same is confirmed by studies conducted by SIRUS in Norway. †Snus is the most commonly used product to stop smoking, perhaps exactly because it is not made as a pharmaceutical NRT [nicotine replacement therapy]? †An observational study by SIRUS from 2012 showed 45.8 per cent of men below [age] 45 who had used snus in their last attempt to quit smoking were currently non-smokers.† †Of those that had used NRTs only 26.3 per cent were currently non-smokers. What is morally correct? As an oncologist with years of experience in cancer care and researching the harmful effects of tobacco, it is a pleasure to know that snus, which is far less harmful, is getting a foothold at the expense of cigarettes. †I myself stopped smoking with the help of snus, and recommended it to patients when all other methods had failed. †If all the tobacco that is smoked today was consumed in the form of snus, tobacco would cease to be a public health issue of any great import. †If you in addition have personal experience with the harm caused by smoking, it becomes a simple ethical choice ? even for a doctor. Moralism rules the debate on snus. †Let it be said. †The healthiest option is to abstain from tobacco altogether, but to deny that snus can help so many smokers to a better life is no moral high ground. It is much rather fatally immoral. Lars Erik Rutqvist
Newbie Answers To Routine Electronic Cigarette Queries http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2013/07/censorship-by-norwegian-health.html

{ Last Page } { Page 1 of 10 } { Next Page }

About Me

My Profile
My Photo Album



Recent Entries

About 50 Baseball Card Protector Sheets About Five Full-sheet Page Protectors Dividers Instructions 1 Gather Binder Supplies!
Discovering Clear-Cut Solutions For E Cigarette
More Chicken Little from Alberta Action on Smoking and Health
V2 Electronic Cigarettes Get Great Reviews, But Are They Safe?
Another Day, Another E-Cigarette Opponent Fabricates Evidence to Deter Use; This Time, It's the World Health Organization


Hosting door HQ ICT Systeembeheer