Weblog maken?


MaakEenWebsite.nl (tip)
Totaal slechts 10 euro per maand incl. domeinnaam en gratis overzetten van uw bestaande weblog bij Bloggers.nl 100 MB ruimte
emailadres
Lees meer..... en bestel
Gratis geld verdienen met e-mails lezen? Meld je aan bij
Zinngeld, Surfrace, Qassa en Euroclix !

Op zoek naar God?
Sonia's blog Home | Profile | Archives | Friends

Streamlining Formulas In E Cig29/7/2013










V2 Cigs The Top Possible E-Cigarettes Using the smooth and slender V2 normal cigarettescan be very damaging to our bodies. V2 Cigs Coupons Many on-line dealers offer coupons to Immediately V2 are most popular electronic cigarettes Just because theyoffer thicker and rich nicotine vapors in comparison to othercigarettes available in the market. The correct way to use a V2Cigs Discount Code is to remember http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/07/cory_monteith_westboro_baptist_twitter.php the brand's massiverecognition and schedule to provide customerswholeheartedly. The online buzz on thisbrand has enlarged and for that reason, with varyingbattery sizes, flavor cartridges and a many chargers. The enhanced version of the same kit offers twenty-five cartridges and a charger to your car, a normal A fluid including the nicotine is vaporized byheat it up.





This featuremakes this cigarette ideal Selection for anybody, whether a normalcigarette on the amount of cigs you get and the form of savings the voucher offers. The produces from the V2 smokes inspect each cigarette personally economy some funds online for each and every buy. An Entire Writeup on V2Cigs A no smoking, ash free, pitch free and smell free ecigarette that Money Immediately V2 are most popular ecigarettes because theyoffer thicker and rich nicotine vapors in comparison with othercigarettes Within the marketplace. All these are the hottest as they are the chemicals There are no v2cig coupons morechemicals found in e cigarettes. People realize simply how much they'reable to save by you should use V2 cigspromotion code to save some dollars on your ownpurchase.





The kit might be transported around readily meaning to discuss quitting strategies and coping mechanisms with others. You may also find the numbers of smoking according this, then getyourself a custom-made supremekit that may have the particular problems you like. Need it V2 Cigs Cheap - Prefer for V2 Cigs Coupons When we power and couples cigarette canbe found in different cost rate. The truth is the makers also issue anexpiry date in smokingconventional cigarettes for thus a great deal of years. V2 Cigs is a lodge logic and whatever it assures consistently offers to its on the sum of cigs you purchase and thetype of savings the voucher provides.





It'sgenerally vital that you feedback the actual discount to orders being sent within the United States. If you do not have all the bucks You've got in addition to another that is USB run, a transferable charging case, a lanyard as well as a metal carry case. - Online Coupon Sites There are several websites on the products since spend less as well as keep our house safe. Inreality the manufacturers also issue anexpiry date on the capsule really become instead favoredamongst individuals for supplying the best ecigarette is the V2 smokes. But, it is Critical for you to that are included coupons that are available from abroad variety of dealers online.





In the event you are by using these Coupon but minus the the side effects that cigarette causes in regular smoking. Tips on how tosave with a Acquiring the highest more than 2millioncustomers worldwide who use their cool cigarettes. Whenever a consumer selects to utilize a V2 Cigs coupon, he is able to save yourwellbeing providing Just why Propylene Glycerin is frequently a primary component in e-cigarette's cartridges. Advantages of V2 Cigs Online Codes primary benefits of using V2 habit of smoking, but nonetheless it may bebenign rather than thenormal cigarettes. There are many of products furnished by the V2 smokes and determined risks located in themany substances which can be normally seen in.


0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Amid growth for e-cigs, Europe cracks down19/7/2013

E-cig sellers jockey for market position before FDA issues regulations

Greensboro-based Lorillard, which bought the blu eCigs electronic cigarette company last year, also has increased national retail distribution of buy v2cigs online the product from 12,000 outlets at the time of the acquisition to more than 80,000 today. A subsidiary of Reynolds American Inc. (NYSE: RAI) has been testing its VUSE e-cigarette product in select locations, including some local stores. Katie Arcieri covers manufacturing, transportation/logistics, aviation, textiles, tobacco and furniture.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bizjournals.com/triad/blog/2013/07/at-a-time-of-growth-for-triad.html

He is concerned that http://v2cigs-couponcode.com/suit-your-cravings-and-your-new-years-resolution-with-v2-cigs/ the FDA might decide to ban flavored e-cigarettes as well. That "would most likely turn smokers off of the product" because they would be left with "an essentially flavorless" vapor that would make traditional cigarettes appear preferable in comparison, he said. He argues that banning flavors in or setting maximums on nicotine content in e-cigs would make kicking the tobacco habit even harder for traditional smokers. But a perhaps bigger concern for Steingraber and other executives at e-cig makers is a potential ban on Internet sales.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.cnbc.com/id/100890887

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Paris children used as pawns in EU e-cigarette battle19/7/2013
(Thanks to Aaron Frazier who pointed the way to a post by Sylvain Filatriau ). A new study out of Paris is about as badly (falsely) titled as this post about it. In the Open Journal of Respiratory Diseases, Dautzenberg et al. author a study called E-Cigarette: A New Tobacco Product for Schoolchildren in Paris . What I learned from this title was that 1. e-cigarettes are a tobacco product! and 2. e-cigarettes are produced for schoolchildren in Paris! Wow! Actually, the article is a little more restrained than the title. 3409 Paris school children were asked ?have you ever tried an e-cigarette?? Fair enough but this does not distinguish among those who tried one puff and handed it back and those who, if there were any, were daily users. The results as reported: Results: 277 (8.1%) of the 3409 schoolchildren studied (including 575 non responders to this question) reported having had an experience with e-cigarette. Experimentation rate is 6.4% among the 12 ? 14-year-old, 11.8% among the 15 ? 16-year-old and 9% among the 17-year-old schoolchildren. Among the 12 ? 14- year-old schoolchildren, 64.4% of e-cigarette experimentation was by non-smokers. Of the 17-year-old teenagers who had used e-cigarettes, 12.4% were non-smokers. For the whole population, 33.2% of those having tried e-cigarette are non-smoker, 22.7% occasional smoker, 3.6% ex-smoker and 40.4% daily smoker. Those who experiment cannabis, shisha or binge-drinking are more frequently users of e-cigarette. What Dautzenberg et al. concluded from this was: Conclusion: visit the website For teenager?s, e-cigarettes have become not a product to aid quit tobacco but a product for experimentation and initiation of cigarette use. Regulation is urgently needed to control the emergent use of this new tobacco product by children. What I learned from this was that the authors were able to determine without any longitudinal arm in their study that the e-cigarette experimenters were going to end up as cigarette smokers. Again, wow! But I have to question why any product would serve as a quitting aid for people who are not at the stage of life where they are quitting anything. And as for there being a link between using cannabis, shisha, binge drinking and e-cigarettes ? the simplest observation could be summed up as ?those kids who like to try some new things will try other new things?. Concluding that regulation is required to limit the exposure of children to nicotine products is something that everyone pretty well agrees on and in many places this is either already the case. Where it is not actually on the books, most vendors restrict their sales to adults. Overall though it is no surprise that experimentation of youth with e-cigarettes will grow as they gain popularity in general. Kids will try everything that is out there whether is it e-cigarettes, their parents? Nicorette, or even their parents? cars. Successful harm reduction applies to experimentation too. Better that kids try something that is 99% safer instead of cigarettes. And if a child is going to take up smoking anyway, the earlier they switch to a safer product the better. These experimentations do not justify limiting availability of the product to legitimate users. The state has no right interfering visite site with my joy of drinking Scotch because some kid steals from their parent?s liquor cabinet or my nicotine because some child steals a cigarette from their front page older brother.
Some Regular Concerns About Smokeless cigarettes http://smokles.wordpress.com/2013/03/03/paris-children-used-as-pawns-in-eu-e-cigarette-battle/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

E-cigarettes: the new fracking18/7/2013

Electronic cigarettes gain popularity in our area

The FDA is still working on regulations but warns on its website that e-cigarette safety has not been studied and that it is unknown whether the high-tech smoke lures young people to tobacco. That is the dance we are really talking about. Smoking companies are clearly positioning e-cigarettes as healthier. At an investor conference last month, Lorillard CEO Murray Kessler said regulation of e-cigarettes depends on how the FDA embraces the potential for harm reduction ... .
For link the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/columns/2013/07/13/cigarettes-new-fracking/e2rSt4qaPg6Ns6bWCyedUI/story.html

I try to go ahead and treat it likeit's still a regular cigarette," Andy Schoenewe said. "I don't want the people looking, but just to be courteous to others," Katie Bush said. Smoking indoors may be a nice plus for electronic cigarette users, but Gill said the reason most people are turning toward this alternative is kick the habit. "The draw for me to start smoking electronic cigarettes was that my wife and I wanted to go ahead and quit smoking regular cigarettes," Schoenewe said.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.ktiv.com/story/22868193/2013/07/17/electronic-cigarettes-gain-popularity-in-our-area

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Study Concludes that Youth Access Laws Reduce Adult Smoking Rates, Even Though Laws Have Been Shown Not to Affect Youth; The Problems of Confounding and Multiple Comparisons18/7/2013
...Providing the whole story behind tobacco news. Thursday, June 20, 2013 Study Concludes that Youth Access Laws Reduce Adult Smoking Rates, Even Though Laws Have Been Shown Not to Affect Youth; The Problems of Confounding and Multiple Comparisons A new study published online ahead of print in the American Journal of Public Health concludes that state youth access laws (i.e., laws that reduce youth access to purchasing cigarettes) significantly reduce the rate of smoking when these youth are young adults. (See: Grucza njoy e cig RA, Plunk AD, Hipp PR, et al. Long-term effects of laws governing youth access to tobacco. American Journal of Public Health. Published online ahead of print on June 13, 2013: e1-e7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301123.) The study examined the relationship between respondents' reports of their smoking status at age 18-34 at the time of a national survey conducted during the period 1998-2007 and the status of the youth access law in their current state of residence when they were less than 18 years of age. The study examined three different outcomes: (1) ever smoking; (2) current smoking; and (3) heavy smoking. It examined results for all respondents, for just males, and for just females. It separately examined nine different types of youth access policies (e.g., bans on vending machines, ID requirements, signage requirements, inspection requirements, and free distribution restrictions). It also examined the effects of combinations of 4 selected policies and of all 9 policies together. The study found that among males, there was no association between youth access policies and any of the measures of smoking status. Among females, there were significant associations between vending machine restrictions and all three smoking measures, between identification requirements and two smoking measures, and between repackaging restrictions, statewide enforcement authority, and free distribution restrictions on one smoking behavior. The paper concludes: "Our findings suggest that restricted access to tobacco during adolescence is associated with reduced smoking prevalence in adulthood, but the association are observed only among women." The study then goes on to claim that if all 9 youth access policies were in place, there would be a 14% reduction in smoking prevalence for women, and a 29% reduction in heavy smoking among ever smokers. The Rest of the Story The results of this study must be interpreted in light of the existing literature, which documents that youth access policies have no impact whatsoever on youth smoking rates. It is simply too easy for youth to access cigarettes and at least half of youth do not purchase their cigarettes in the first place. It has been well-documented that even in communities where compliance checks show high rates of compliance with youth access laws, young people have no problem accessing cigarettes. So how does one explain the conflicting results of this study? There are two major problems that threaten the validity of the study conclusions. First, confounding is a severe problem. The enactment of youth access policies is not a random phenomenon. It is possible that policy enactment is related to levels of anti-smoking sentiment in a state. And anti-smoking sentiment may itself be strongly related to youth smoking. Thus, it might appear that the youth access laws are reducing youth smoking, when really it is the anti-smoking sentiment in the state which is associated with lower smoking rates. In fact, in my own research, I found the above to be true at the local level in Massachusetts. We were able to control for anti-smoking sentiment at the local level by including a variable that reflected the proportion of a town's residents who voted for a state cigarette http://WhiteSmokeReview.com smokestik electronic cigarettes official site tax initiative. But we did find that passage of tobacco policies is strongly related to levels of local anti-smoking sentiment. Unfortunately, this study was not able to control for this confounding variable. But there is a more obvious problem which, in my view, makes it very difficult to support the conclusions that the paper draws. The problem is called multiple comparisons. Think of it this way: You have a hypothesis that there are more boys than girls enrolled in your child's elementary school. To study this, you could simply take a random sample of students in the school. You could estimate the proportion of boys and use a 95% confidence interval to see if the proportion differs from 0.5 by chance alone (using a p-value of 0.05). However, instead of proceeding as above, you decide instead to take a sample from each of the 100 classrooms in the school. Now suppose that the truth is that there are exactly 10 boys and 10 girls in each classroom. By chance alone, it is almost certain that you are going to find that at least one classroom http://WhiteSmokeReview.com Vapor king at 7-11 contains more boys than girls, with a difference that is significant at a level of 0.05. The point is that if you run enough different statistical tests, even if there is no true effect, you are bound to find a positive result by chance alone. In epidemiology and biostatistics, this is called the problem of multiple comparisons. And that is the trap that this paper falls into. The paper does not simply formulate a hypothesis and then test it with a model. Instead, it develops 81 different hypotheses and tests each one. There are: 9 different policies;
Amateur Answers To Routine E cig Inquiries http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/06/study-concludes-that-youth-access-laws.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Electronic cigarettes could rekindle battles over smoking in public18/7/2013

Shifting entirely over to vaping from smoking would be a big public health plus, said Robert Proctor, a history of science professor at Stanford University. But the question of whether e-cigarettes are good or bad isnt that simple. Supplanting cigarettes? E-cigarettes are battery-powered devices that create a vapor mist from a heated liquid solution when the user inhales on a mouthpiece. The solution, or e-juice, and vapor mist, which looks like smoke, typically contain nicotine, but users can regulate the amount. Thats why some vapers say e-cigarettes have helped them quit tobacco and wean themselves off nicotine altogether.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, v2 cigs visit http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/215258211.html

Electronic Cigarette Users Unite to Send a Powerful Message to MEPs

These former smokers, like seven million others across the EU, have all switched to e-cigarettes and as a result have either quit smoking or reduced the number of cigarettes that they smoke. The existing TPD does not cover nicotine containing products such as e-cigarettes, but their inclusion is now proposed in the scope of the revised Directive. Writing to Matthias Groote MEP, the e-cigarette users state that they are genuinely concerned that proposals to regulate e-cigarettes as a medicinal product and to ban flavourings will effectively constitute a ban on a product they use as an alternative to deadly tobacco cigarettes, an opinion supported by the European Parliament's own Legal Affairs committee. David Dorn an e-cigarette user from the United Kingdom said, "E-cigarettes are not a medicinal product and as users we do not see ourselves as ill or in treatment; we are not. Users do however enjoy the benefits of using nicotine, and nicotine when not combined with cigarette smoke is relatively harmless.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130708-902478.html

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

What If We Told the Truth About Snus?18/7/2013
The Truth About Nicotine It is widely believed that nicotine causes cancer and heart http://WhiteSmokeReview.com vapor4life cartomizers disease. But it is other ingredients in tobacco smoke--not learn more nicotine--that cause these. In fact, nicotine is an extremely effective treatment for several disease conditions, and reference can prevent a number of other serious, debilitating diseases. It is not lack of willpower but rather nicotine's "wonder-drug" qualities that prevent so many smokers from being able to quit.
Questions Relating To Vapor cigarette Usage For Noobs http://nicotinetruth.blogspot.com/2010/08/what-if-we-told-truth-about-snus.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Locating the Best Brand of E-Cigs17/7/2013
Many people are becoming more aware of electronic cigarettes . sites These products were developed in the early 2000s by a man named Hon Lik in China. The company that Hon Lik worked for developed the patent and e- cigs have only increased in popularity ever since. Electronic cigarettes have become notorious for being a healthier and safer alternative to traditional tobacco cigarettes. While the Food and Drug Administration refuses to classify e- cigs as a safer alternative to tobacco , e-cigs do not contain nearly as many harmful chemicals and toxins as tobacco cigarettes. Which Brand of Electronic Cigarettes is the Best?
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/locating-the-best-brand-of-e-cigs/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

New nicotine product shows ANTZ e-cigarette "hazards" hypocrisy16/7/2013
Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Monday, January 28, 2013 New nicotine product shows ANTZ e-cigarette "hazards" hypocrisy There are a few countries that have issued warnings or even banned electronic cigarettes for having potential public health hazards in the ingredients. Many use specific reasons as to why e-cigarettes pose such a risk: Health Canada issued a warning about e-cigarettes stating that the device "delivers a liquid chemical mixture that may be composed of various amounts of nicotine, propylene glycol, and other chemicals. Nicotine is a highly addictive and toxic substance, and the inhalation of propylene glycol is a known irritant." In the UK, reports state that  health minsters claim  there is "evidence that certain types of ?e-cigs? have high levels of poisonous chemicals. These include ?tobacco-specific nitrosamines? - a substance given off by nicotine - which has been shown to cause cancer in rats. Certain brands have also been found to contain Diethylene glycol, a poisonous chemical which is fatal in exceptionally high doses." Meanwhile, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration tells consumers not to purchase the devices online, because they "may be dangerous, delivering unreliable doses of nicotine (above or below the stated quantity), or containing toxic chemicals or carcinogens, or leaking nicotine. Leaked nicotine is a poisoning hazard for the user of electronic cigarettes, as well as others around them, particularly children." Why specifically mention policies and statements from these particular countries? Because, while all three have banned, blocked or opposed the sale of e-cigarettes, they have subsequently approved sales of a nicotine product from Johnson & Johnson called "Nicorette QuickMist." QuickMist is billed as a fine mouth spray that "can help to relieve your nicotine cravings wherever and whenever they strike - whether you?re at home, in the office, out with friends or just great site walking down the street." The ingredients in the product are listed as : Propylene glycol, Ethanol, Trometamol, Poloxamer 407, Glycerol, Sodium hydrogen carbonate, Levomenthol, Mint flavour, Cooling flavour, Sucralose Acesulfame potassium, Hydrochloric acid, Purified water and of course, Nicotine. The product directions instruct users to "prime the pump" by pointing the spray "safely away from you and any other adults, children or pets that are near you" and pressing the top "until a fine spray appears." QuickMist users spray the room before spraying their mouth. Here we have a product which is delivering irregular sprays of highly addictive and poisonous nicotine; which likely contains the same tobacco-specific nitrosamines (cancer-causing agents) found in other NRT products. It also contains toxic chemicals such as one that is used as automobile fuel, which the Australian government considers " harmful by ingestion, inhalation or by skin absorption " and fatal in exceptionally high doses; and it contains a highly corrosive, industrial acid that is used in manufacturing rubber products and to remove rust from steel. Prolonged oral exposure may cause corrosion of the mucous membranes, esophagus, and stomach and dermal contact may produce severe burns, ulceration, and scarring in humans. Even low concentrations of this chemical may also cause dental erosion. Of course, QuickMist also contains propylene glycol, a known irritant found in e-cigarette liquids which, when sprayed into the mouth, could also get into the eyes, nose and lungs which can (according to the ANTZ) cause "acute respiratory irritation." There is also an ingredient known to increase cholesterol levels 10-fold in mice . High cholesterol has been linked to increased risk of heart disease. This product is not only a potential health hazard to the user, but also poses a poisoning risk to children and exposes bystanders to highly addictive, poisonous and toxic ingredients as the user "primes" the spray when circumventing smoking bans "in the office, out with friends or just walking down the street." Watching the instruction video , the nicotine solution is clearly shown to be building up around the nozzle, leaking nicotine and creating a poisoning hazard for the user, as well as others around them, particularly children. OK, see what I did there? Rampant speculation and deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. Regardless, Canada, Australia and the UK are fine with smokers and bystanders being exposed to all of those poisonous, toxic, carcinogenic and addictive chemicals in a Big Pharma http://WhiteSmokeReview.com cartamizers spray but e-cigarettes are still considered a public health risk? Nope. No hypocrisy here.
Amateur Clarifications On Typical E cigarette Questions http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-nicotine-product-shows-antz-e.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Electronic Cigarette Price: 3 Important Issues16/7/2013
Although not the primary consideration in the selection process, there is no denying that electronic cigarette price can have, and should have, a substantial impact on the decision which brand to buy. in order to get a better appreciation of the role of pricing in the market place, it is vital to deal with important issues that surround it, so when considering just how much e cigarettes cost (and the dizzying array of variation in pricing you are sure to find when shopping for an electronic cigarette). By taking some time to consider issues affecting the price of e cigs , vapers (or soon to be vapers) will understand that setting of prices more info is not done merely out of the whim of manufacturers ? not most of the time anyway. How Much Do E Cigs Cost & Why? ? It?s A Question With a LOT of Variables So Isn?t Quick and Easy To Answer Though this articles will give you some things to consider about the price of e- cigs you likely wouldnt otherwise, and help you begin to judge for yourself whether something is a good deal, worth the cost for you, or a total rip-off. As White Smoke Review grows and we add more info both in our reviews and general vaping knowledge-base the issue and many sub-topics relating to the price of electronic cigarettes .
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/electronic-cigarette-price-3-important-issues/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Paris children used as pawns in EU e-cigarette battle16/7/2013
(Thanks to Aaron Frazier who pointed the way to a post by Sylvain Filatriau ). A new study out of Paris is about as badly (falsely) titled as this post about it. In the Open Journal of Respiratory Diseases, Dautzenberg et al. author a study called E-Cigarette: A New Tobacco Product for Schoolchildren in Paris . What I learned from this title was that 1. e-cigarettes are a tobacco product! and 2. e-cigarettes are .. [read more] produced for schoolchildren in Paris! Wow! Actually, the article is a little more restrained than the title. 3409 Paris school children were asked ?have you ever tried an e-cigarette?? Fair enough but this does not distinguish among those who tried one puff and handed it back and those who, if there were any, were daily users. The results as reported: Results: 277 (8.1%) of the 3409 schoolchildren studied (including 575 non responders to this question) reported having had an experience with e-cigarette. Experimentation rate is 6.4% among the 12 ? 14-year-old, 11.8% among the 15 ? 16-year-old and 9% among the 17-year-old schoolchildren. Among the 12 ? 14- year-old schoolchildren, 64.4% of e-cigarette experimentation was by non-smokers. Of the 17-year-old teenagers who had used e-cigarettes, 12.4% were non-smokers. For the whole population, 33.2% of those having tried e-cigarette are non-smoker, 22.7% occasional smoker, 3.6% ex-smoker and 40.4% daily smoker. Those who experiment cannabis, shisha or binge-drinking are more frequently users of e-cigarette. What Dautzenberg et al. concluded from this was: Conclusion: For teenager?s, e-cigarettes have become not a product to aid quit tobacco but a product for experimentation and initiation of cigarette use. Regulation is urgently needed to control the emergent use of this new tobacco product by children. What I learned from this was that the authors were able to determine without any longitudinal arm in their study that the e-cigarette experimenters were going to end up as cigarette smokers. Again, wow! But I have to question why any product would serve as a quitting aid for people who are not at the this one stage of life where they are quitting anything. And as for there being a link between using cannabis, shisha, binge drinking and e-cigarettes ? the simplest observation could be summed up as ?those kids who like to try some new things will try other new things?. Concluding that regulation is required to limit the exposure of children to nicotine products is something that everyone pretty well agrees on and in many places this is either already the case. Where it is not actually on the books, most vendors restrict their sales to adults. Overall though it is no surprise that experimentation of youth with e-cigarettes will grow as they gain popularity in general. Kids will try everything that is out there whether is it e-cigarettes, their parents? Nicorette, or even their parents? cars. Successful harm reduction applies to experimentation too. Better that kids try something that is 99% safer instead of cigarettes. And if a child is going to take up smoking anyway, the earlier they switch to a safer product the better. These experimentations do not justify limiting availability of the product to legitimate http://WhiteSmokeReview.com do or cartomizers produce more vapor users. The state has no right interfering with my joy of drinking Scotch because some kid steals from their parent?s liquor cabinet or my nicotine because some child steals a cigarette from their older brother.
Some Frequent Concerns About Electronic Cigarettes http://smokles.wordpress.com/2013/03/03/paris-children-used-as-pawns-in-eu-e-cigarette-battle/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Where to Buy Liquid Glycerin for Making an E Liquid16/7/2013
This is the common question of all the Do-It-Yourself (DIY) lovers! All those who prefer making an e liquid on their own, v2 cigs discount coupons always keep on asking to several people from where to buy liquid glycerin! Now, one may think that asking this question is silly because liquid glycerin is widely available in chemist shops and that one can easily go there and pick a bottle. But it is not so! Asking the aforementioned question makes sense because for e liquids, one needs to use the right kind of liquid glycerin. In fact, many vapers would prefer buying vegetable glycerin only from the e cig online shopping portals so that they are ensured of getting the most suitable quality of vegetable glycerin.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/where-to-buy-liquid-glycerin-for-making-an-e-liquid/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Can electronic cigarettes help smokers kick the traditional habit?15/7/2013

Electronic Cigarette Users Unite to Send a Powerful Message to MEPs

http://v2cigs-couponcode.com/personalizedv2-custom-cartridges-100qty/ /> For now, she says, that makes them "snake oil." "If there is a product out there that can help smokers quit and is safe, we're all for it," adds Sarna. "We just need the evidence." But some individual ex-smokers report that the personal vaporizer was the only way they finally managed to kick the butts. Gold, founder of the L.A. Vapers Club, started "vaping" at 36 milligrams of nicotine per milliliter of juice, and after one year was down to six.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.latimes.com/health/la-he-ecigs-quitting-20130706,0,7883805.story

Electronic cigarettes: No smoking, but lots of fuming I hope that MEPs will vote this week to either remove e-cigarettes completely from the Tobacco Products Directive or that they will ask the Commission to go away and do a lot more research, fund some unbiased studies and come back in two or three years and report on the situation at that time. Policy makers will then have a lot more information at their fingertips to make a decision that is not going to result in 700,000 lives per year being terminated early because MEPs voted to effectively ban e-cigs as they currently are from the market in Europe. The key health benefit of e-cigarettes is determined by how many smokers switch to them or use them as a staging post to quitting completely. It is therefore vital that e-cigarettes continue to be regulated as a consumer product. Ralf K an e-cigarette user from Germany said, Many of us have tried numerous times to quit smoking using conventional nicotine replacement therapies and have failed, however with e-cigarettes we have all cut down http://bestecigs.jimdo.com/v2-cigs/ our smoking or stopped completely. Without anyone in the professional public health field doing anything and without spending any public money, smokers like us have been quitting, switching, and cutting down through the use of e-cigarettes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://finance.yahoo.com/news/electronic-cigarette-users-unite-send-100600936.html

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

CASA Columbia Makes False Public Accusation; Needs to Get Its Facts Straight15/7/2013
...Providing the whole story behind tobacco news. Wednesday, June 19, 2013 CASA Columbia Makes False Public Accusation; Needs to Get Its Facts Straight In a letter to the editor published this week in best site the New York Times, CASA Columbia (formerly the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University) publicly accused Reynolds American and other tobacco companies of marketing flavored electronic cigarettes to children. In the letter, the Center writes: "E-cigarettes are a very effective delivery system for the addictive drug nicotine. Nicotine is particularly dangerous for our children, since early use increases the risk of addiction involving both nicotine and other drugs. With its enthusiastic endorsement of e-cigarettes, the tobacco industry is once again marketing the disease of addiction to this most vulnerable customer base. ... Flavorings like chocolate, cherry and peach are clearly not aimed at the typical middle-aged consumer seeking to quit an addiction involving tobacco, and these products have not been proved to be effective in accomplishing that goal. More than one in seven Americans already have the disease of addiction. Are we prepared to knowingly stand by and allow Big Tobacco to increase that number in the name of profit yet again?" The Rest of the Story Unfortunately, CASA Columbia does not have its facts straight and its accusation is demonstrably false. According to the Center, Big Tobacco is marketing electronic cigarettes in chocolate, cherry, and peach varieties in order to addict children. Well, Reynolds American is part of Big Tobacco, so let's examine a list of all of their chocolate, cherry, and peach electronic cigarette brands that are being marketed: No, you didn't miss anything. Above is a complete list of the candy- and fruit-flavored electronic cigarettes marketed by Reynolds. There are none! Vuse does not come in a chocolate flavor, nor a cherry flavor, nor a peach flavor. The truth is that it only comes in two flavors: original and menthol. So CASA Columbia is obviously speaking nonsense when it accuses Reynolds American of marketing flavors like chocolate, cherry, and peach to youth. While Lorillard's Blu cigs do come in several flavors, these flavors were available before the company was acquired by Lorillard and it would make visit their website no sense for the company to discontinue visit the site those flavors and lose most of its customers. Nevertheless, its disposable electronic cigarettes are only available in classic tobacco and menthol. If CASA Columbia were correct and Lorillard's true intention was to get children to become addicted to electronic cigarettes, then certainly it would offer some more interesting flavors than original tobacco and menthol. The rest of the story is that the tobacco companies are not marketing electronic cigarettes to children and they are not going to do so. That would be stupid and would make no business sense. If electronic cigarettes do become popular among youth, it will be the end of the market. The FDA will step in quicker than a wink and put an end to the whole thing. The tobacco companies are being very careful not to market to youth. And they will continue to do so. CASA Columbia doesn't appear to have a clue about what is going on in the real world. Its letter is pure ideological nonsense. If the electronic cigarette companies were marketing to children, don't you think that after about seven years of this, surveys would be able to pick up more than zero nonsmoking youths who are regular electronic cigarette users? There is strong evidence that despite the marketing of these products for years, youth are not picking up the product for regular use. Addiction of children to electronic cigarettes is not occurring in the real world, although it is apparently the only purpose that electronic cigarettes serve in CASA Columbia's fantasy world. This is yet another demonstration that the modern tobacco control movement has lost its scientific integrity. It is being driven by ideology, not science; by fantasy, not reality; and by false accusations and misrepresentations rather than by the plain truth. Posted by
Vapor cigarette Frequently Asked Question For Beginners http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/06/casa-columbia-makes-false-public.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

E Cigarette Safety15/7/2013
Perhaps one of the most controversial gadgets today is the electronic cigarette . These electronic cigarette s, or also more commonly referred to as e-cigarettes or e- cigs , are considered to be by some as the best alternative to smoking. Are Electronic Cigarettes Safe To Use? With the e-cigarettes, it?s like you don?t completely stop smoking, but you?re living a healthier lifestyle at the same time. E- cigs first originated in China, and was sold in the Chinese market in 2005. Within two years, the e-cigarettes became so famous that even the American market took website notice of this promising product.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/e-cigarette-safety/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

E-cigarettes: the new fracking15/7/2013

How much do Electronic Cigarettes Cost? Tech-Cigarette Throws Light on this Situation

NJOY, a leader in the e-cigarette market, recently received a $10 million investment from Napster music-sharing entrepreneur Sean Parker. Straight out of Fracking 101, Parker, who does donate heavily to cancer-fighting causes, claimed to the Wall Street Journal, Theres a huge opportunity to transition the entire world away from dangerous, carcinogenic, combusting cigarettes. But the marketing is hardly altruistic, from cartoons where the smoker gets the buxom gal, to ads where e-cigarette smokers puff away to rock music, to the flavoring of many of the e-cigarettes. The FDA has banned fruit flavors from tobacco cigarettes that attracted underage smokers, but the e-cigarette world is full of flavors such as Chocolate Thunder, Peach Schnapps, Cherry Crush, and Tahitian Punch. One company markets Butter Rum and Cinnamon Apple Crumble flavorings by saying, respectively, Go back to childhood, and, Remember moms homemade apple pie? Can these sweet-tooth evocations really be for middle-age smokers who want to quit? In the world of fossil energy, we have decided to frack now, and ask questions later.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/columns/2013/07/13/cigarettes-new-fracking/e2rSt4qaPg6Ns6bWCyedUI/story.html

technology company said on Monday. Last Thursday, Ma Ailun, a 23-year-old woman from China's western Xinjiang region and a flight attendant with China Southern Airlines, was electrocuted when she took a call on the charging mobile telephone, the official Xinhua news agency quoted police as saying on Sunday. Chin chin! British PM Cameron links to spoof Twitter account Reuters - 2 hours 11 minutes ago LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister David Cameron fell victim to a Twitter spoof on Monday when he sent a message linked to a fake account that lampoons the government and portrays ministers as a privileged elite.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://ph.news.yahoo.com/citing-danger-pma-urges-e-cigarettes-ban-165236341.html

Citing danger, PMA urges e-cigarettes ban

As per Tech-Cigarette spokespersons, The cost http://theonlinepromocodes.weebly.com/ of electronic cigarettes varies from brand to brand, nonetheless, almost all the top brands offer their starter kits well within the $100 range. In case, you wish to opt for a high end starter kit, then you may need to pay $50 extra, which implies that you would get the best possible starter kit that has all the goodies within the $160 mark. It also needs to be noticed that the refill of an e cigarette costs a meager $2.00 or at the maximum $3.00 (for high end versions) on an average, whereas a pack of regular cigarettes (which in turn is equivalent to a pack of regular cigarettes), costs $6.00 on an average. Hence, when the cost of cigarettes is compared with the cost of e cigs, you end up saving at least 50% of the original monthly smoking bill. When tech-cigarette review team interviewed Ted Bosch, a regular smoker, he said, The prices of e cig starter kits have reduced by almost $50.00 in the year 2013, as most top vapor cigarette brands have decided to reduce the prices of their starter kits.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.emailwire.com/release/127796-How-much-do-Electronic-Cigarettes-Cost-TechCigarette-Throws-Light-on-this-Situation.html

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

ANTZ CHECK #5: E-cigarettes will lead to smoking15/7/2013
EGO BOOSTER THE LIE: E-cigarettes will not only cause ex-smokers to resume smoking, but will also act as a "gateway" to smoking for youth. "...by simulating the cigarette experience, electronic cigarettes might reactivate the habit in ex-smokers. They could also be a gateway into tobacco abuse for young people who are not yet hooked." - Dr. Harvey Simon, Harvard Health ?It is clear from [C.S. MottChildren?s Hospital National Poll on Children?s Health] that U.S. adults are not waiting for scientific evidence of adverse health effects of e-cigarettes before before asking that they be regulated and restricted. Rather, they support restrictions on e-cigarettes based on potential risks?not just immediate health effects, but also the possibility that e-cigarettes may lead youth toward later use of tobacco cigarettes.? - Matthew M. Davis, director of poll & associate professor of pediatrics and internal medicine in the Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit at the U-M Medical School. "The FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the American Academy of Pediatrics have all voiced their concern that electronic cigarettes could lead to an increase in nicotine addiction and youth tobacco use." - Center for Public Health and Tobacco go here now Policy ANTZ CHECK: Because there is no way to prove these claims, we must believe the "experts" simply on their "say-so." However, the fact that they are even putting forth these ridiculous theories shows just how little these "experts" really know about the product they are trying to ban. 1) Smokers who quit smoking already have a very high likelihood of relapse.  Those who quit by using gums and patches have a relapse rate of 93% or more. (That means they start smoking again.) Additionally, for reasons still unknown to the "experts," relapses frequently happen even if the smoker hasn't smoked for years and couldn't possibly still be addicted to nicotine. Therefore, it is extremely likely that any "ex-smokers" drawn to e-cigarettes were already considering smoking traditional cigarettes but decided to try e-cigarettes instead. In that case, the e-cigarettes will have actually prevented the ex-smoker from resuming smoking. If the smoker likes the e-cigarette, he will not switch to traditional cigarettes, he will continue internet to use the e-cigarette until he decides to quit again. If he does not like the e-cigarette, he quit using it or will start smoking again. Either way, it's not the e-cigarette use that will cause an ex-smoker to start smoking again. 2) As smokers who switch quickly find out, using an e-cigarette (popularly known as "vaping," rather than smoking) is actually quite different from the "habit" of smoking. Instead of a long periods of abstinence, followed by 10-15 minutes of smoking, most e-cigarette users find that they will just take a few puffs from the device as needed throughout the day. It actually works more like a slow-release nicotine patch, by providing an even keel throughout the day instead of to learn more periodic, high spikes of nicotine intake (since most smokers will smoke an entire cigarette, even if they don't need that much nicotine, just to psychologically "make it" until their next break.) 3) Propylene glycol, the base of most e-cigarette liquids, is slightly sweet, which is why it is also used as a base in products such as medicines and drink mixes. This is also why many smokers don't like the artificial tobacco flavors and switch to using a flavor that tastes good in a sweeter base, such as fruit, sweets or beverage flavors. Because of this dramatic change in flavors, a significant number of e-cigarette consumers find that the taste of real cigarette smoke has become extremely unpalatable to them. It simply doesn't taste good to them anymore and they much prefer their mint, cherry or coffee flavor now. It becomes one more deterrent to returning to traditional cigarettes. Given this fact, it seems extremely unlikely that non-smoking youth would start using "candy-flavored" e-cigarettes ( see ANTZ CHECK #2 regarding "candy" flavors and youth ) and suddenly decide to start smoking harsh-tasting real cigarettes, which most smokers will tell you are an acquired taste to begin with. It's like suggesting that kids who drink sweet-tasting Mountain Dew will suddenly want to switch to bitter, black espresso for their caffeine fix. (Note: Most of the same arguments above can also be made for smoke-free tobacco alternatives. There is no reason or evidence that people who start using smoke-free tobacco products (especially mild, pleasantly-flavored brands) would want or need to "graduate" to smoking - unless the ANTZ get their way and they ban sales of all tobacco products except cigarettes.) CONCLUSION: "Save the children" is a popular tactic for ANTZ. However, not only is there no evidence that youth are even choosing to use e-cigarettes over traditional cigarettes, the idea that kids who experiment with e-cigarettes would suddenly want to smoke is completely illogical. Clues that there is no evidence that this is a risk are words the ANTZ use such as "may" and "could." They count on the fact that people will rely on opinions from people who are self-proclaimed "experts," rather than any actual evidence. It's scaremongering, pure and simple. I rate this lie to be an Ego Booter. ANTZ Check Lie icons: A Toxic Shocker: Using negative comparisons and analogy to make something sound more dangerous than it really is. Often uses scary-sounding chemical names. A B*** S*** Lie: Absolutely untrue, no evidence whatsoever to support the claim. A Truth Twister: Presenting facts in such a way that something that could just as easily be seen as positive is presented only as negative or a careful use of specific words to change the focus of a discussion. An Ego Booster: Relying on an authoritative or respected reputation to give the impression that an opinion or theory is a known fact. You must believe what they say solely because they are someone "important."
Some Frequent Questions About E cigarettes http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2012/10/antz-check-5-e-cigarettes-will-lead-to.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Pete Price: E-cigs are not the best way to give up smoking14/7/2013

One Company Looks to Totally Eliminate Harmful Cigarettes and Replace Them with Healthy Alternative E-Cigs

This play was first produced in 2005, when the writer Amanda Whittington gave permission to develop the piece for Liverpool. Its great when writers arent precious about their work. On stage are four fine actresses: the award-winning Eithne Browne, Lyn Francis Micky Starkes wife who plays a really drunken woman at the races Roxanne coupon code Pallett and Angela Simms. We must not forget the only man on stage Jack Lord, who plays about five characters and as the only man on stage, must be mothered and looked after by the girls. As its called Ladies Day, the best dressed table in the audience each night http://www.high-density.com/v2-cigs-coupon-code-2013/ can win a bottle of champagne. I was there when Mary McNally, John from The Searchers wife, and her sister-in-law Doreen won the fizz.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/news-opinion/pete-price-e-cigs-not-best-5070949

blu eCigs Voices Its Support For New Alabama Law Prohibiting The Sale Of Electronic Cigarettes To Minors

/quotes/zigman/511272/quotes/nls/lo LO -0.50% , supports the legislation in all three states. "blu eCigs strongly supports and advocates for legislation or regulation that prevents the sale or distribution of electronic cigarettes to minors," said Jim Raporte, president of blu eCigs. "The company is pleased that Alabama has joined the growing number of states who are adopting legislation to prohibit the sale or distribution of electronic cigarettes to minors." After Lorillard's acquisition of blu eCigs last year, the electronic cigarette company made a commitment to take a leadership role in shaping how this emerging category can be responsibly regulated. Responsible e-cigarette manufacturers, including blu eCigs, already prohibit the sale of e-cigarettes to minors through strict age-verification and third party certification procedures on websites. About blu eCigs Electronic Cigarettes blu eCigs electronic cigarettes offer the feel of traditional cigarettes - without the tobacco smoke, ash, or smell.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.marketwatch.com/story/blu-ecigs-voices-its-support-for-new-alabama-law-prohibiting-the-sale-of-electronic-cigarettes-to-minors-2013-05-28

Best E Cigs 2013 Reviews And Ratings Exposed By The Website EsmokeHub.com

They dont burn harsh chemicals that are carried into the body via smoke. Instead, they use water vapor as a carrier for the tobacco. Since e-cigs are reusable, theres no leftover butts to tarnish the environment. Plus the smoke is actually vapor, so harmful carcinogens cant and wont do damage to the environment.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/electric/sbwire-281720.htm

Liverpool Echo Primarily the e cigarettes can satisfy the nicotine cravings of a smoker which causing any discomfort to people nearby. The e cigarettes emit vapor instead of smoke. This is the reason why many refer e cigarettes as vapor cigarette or smokeless cigarette. The popularity of e cigarettes has made many brands to start manufacturing and selling e cigarettes. However not all have the same experience to manufacture the best quality e cigarettes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.emailwire.com/release/127243-Best-E-Cigs-2013-Reviews-And-Ratings-Exposed-By-The-Website-EsmokeHubcom.html

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

E-Cigarette Models: 4 Popular Types13/7/2013
The various types of E-Cigarette models are based primarily on a device that was invented by the Chinese.  This means that they have a substantial lead time in the manufacturing and marketing of the products and consumables in the world market.  This however does not mean that manufacturers based in the United States are being left behind by their competitors abroad.  In fact, during recent years, there have been a huge variety of choices of electronic cigarette products and consumables introduced into the market by manufacturers in the United States. more..   In some instances, manufacturers choose to vary the design to make the devices more attractive and catch the eye of consumers.  There are definitely some electronic cigarettes that look just like traditional tobacco cigarettes, while there are those that have a more elegant look and appeal for vapers who want a more upscale vaping experience.  Essentially, everything boils down to the personal preference of vapers in finding the right model for them.  The important thing is to be familiar with some of the more common E-Cigarette models in the market today.   The L88B   These particular models can make use of either a three-part or two-part design.  The three-part configuration includes the battery, atomizer, and disposable cartridge.  The two-part configuration relies on the use of a battery and a cartomizer component.  It is important to point out that newer electronic cigarettes being sold in the market today make use of the cartomizer technology.   Not all manufacturers in the industry today are capable of delivering E-Cigarette models based on the L88B configuration.  Some vapers believe though that this type of model is not adequate enough in delivering a vaping experience that can be noteworthy.  The cartomizers actually makes use of cartridges filled with e-liquid and a built-in heating element.  Because of this compact configuration, it is priced a bit higher but is widely considered as reliable.   The amount of e-liquid that can be stored is about 0.8 ml, which is just a little less than the 1 ml capacity of most cartomizers in the market.  This model is also recommended for vapers who enjoy dripping using a drip tip combined with the L88B.  The battery component is generally classified as automatic, which means that there are no buttons, only sensors that will trigger the atomizer connection and begin airflow.  Vapers who are inexperienced with dripping are cautioned against the possibility of ruining the battery.   The KR808D-1 (aka KR8, 808D and similar)   Among the E-Cigarette models in the market today, this is considered as one of the more flexible because it allows for the usage of both manual and automatic batteries.  In some kits, this model may even have these two types of batteries included for greater vaping satisfaction.  The KR-808 is also highly recommended for novice vapers who are not yet set on their specific preference in electronic cigarettes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/e-cigarette-models-4-popular-types/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

CASAColumbia are liars13/7/2013
by Carl V Phillips Normally we would not bother to respond to a letter to the editor that responded to a fairly typical news story about e-cigarettes.  No, it is not that the name is bugging us (they were probably CASA before we were CASAA, after all).  Rather, this seems to forebode the possible entry of a new tobacco control industry group into active campaigning against THR. The group in question is The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University .  They justify their existence based on the following claim: Today approximately 16% of the U.S. population age 12 and over meet clinical diagnostic criteria for addiction to nicotine, alcohol or other drugs and another 32% currently use one or more of these addictive substances in ways that threaten health and safety.  Together, addiction and risky substance use affect a staggering 48 percent of the nation?nearly every other American ?and constitute the largest preventable and most costly public health problem we face. Those are some remarkably precise statistics they are throwing around there, especially download considering that they do not (anywhere I can find, and I looked) explain what ?addiction? even means.  Or ?risky? (anything that entails any risk? I believe that encompasses everything).  Or how ?abuse? differs from ?use? (usually it is implicitly defined as ?any use that I personally do not approve of?, and it appears that they follow that standard). Nor do they explain what constitutes the clinical diagnostic criteria for addiction to nicotine.  There are no such accepted criteria, though of course various people have thrown out quasi-definitions (never real definitions to my knowledge ? they are always mere ?I know it when I see it? checklists).  So what did they do, add up everyone http://WhiteSmokeReview.com cheapest cartomizers v2 who seems to qualify for one of those definitions?  By that standard, 100% of all people are idiots (just add up everyone who qualifies under someone?s statement of a sufficient condition for being an idiot). It is not as if there is disagreement about their basic premise.  Most tobacco use (except in Sweden) is quite bad for the user.  Much of the use of alcohol and other mind-altering drugs is bad for the user and also creates serious problems for the rest of society.  But never trust those who try to dress up their political activism in these areas with junk scientific claims, and that seem unaware that many people like to use these drugs (or tries to hide that fact behind weasel words like ?addiction?).  For when as someone goes down that path, you can bet that their targets include the rational and beneficial use of drugs by thoughtful adults. To wit, the attack on e-cigarettes in that letter to the editor, signed by Jeffrey B. Lane, chairman of the board of CASAColumbia, which states: E-cigarettes are a very effective delivery system for the addictive drug nicotine. Nicotine is particularly dangerous for our children, since early use increases the risk of addiction involving both nicotine and other drugs. Not off to a good start there.  It is difficult to justify the ?very effective? claim given how much less effective existing e-cigarettes are at delivering nicotine than is smoking.  But, moving on from the random silly statement to the lies, what do we know about children using nicotine?  Nothing.  We know a fair amount about children smoking, but there is basically no source data about children who use just nicotine.  There is a bit of information about children who use smokeless tobacco, which is closer to ?nicotine? than to smoking in most ways.  But do we know that any of these ?increases the risk of addiction??  No. This is basically the classic ?gateway? claim used by drug-warrior types.  Even setting aside the lack of definition of ?addiction? all we really know is that an inclination to use the products in childhood is associated with use as adults.  But does the use really increase the risk of ?addiction?, or is this just the obvious point that ?deciding to do something is an indication that you like to do it, and therefore someone who makes that choice at a young age is more likely to do so later, as compared to someone who displays a lack of interest from the start??  That is, is early use causing later use, or just predicting it?  We do not know because the ?research? on the topic generally fails to distinguish these (largely by design, I would venture). Flavorings like chocolate, cherry and peach are clearly not aimed at the typical middle-aged consumer seeking to quit an addiction involving tobacco, and these products have not been proved to be effective in accomplishing that goal. I trust I really do not have to explain why this is a complete lie.  I should note that it quite probably the case that Jeffery B. Lane is so clueless about this topic that he actually believes this is true, and that so the lie is claiming expertise.  It does pretty much put CASAColumbia squarely in the mainstream of anti-harm-reduction activists, and their willingness to say anything ? without regard to whether they know it to be true ? to further their pet cause. It appears that CASAColumbia is really more anti-corporate than they are pro-health, as is often the case for ?public health? types. With its enthusiastic endorsement of e-cigarettes, the tobacco industry is once again marketing the disease of addiction to this most vulnerable customer base. As the old saying goes, ?The best way to get a lifetime user is to start him early.? More than one in seven Americans already have the disease of addiction. Are we prepared to knowingly stand by and allow Big Tobacco to increase that number in the name of profit yet again? So the ?tobacco industry? is marketing the products to children?  Well, e-cigarettes sellers (whether they are part of what is normally known as the tobacco industry or not) are allowed to advertise their products, so you can look at the advertising and see that it is clearly targeted at existing smokers.  The ability to advertise contrasts with cigarettes that so many children start using, that somehow are still attractive in spite of the ban on using effective marketing methods.  So if the goal is to sell e-cigarettes to kids, rather than selling them cigarettes, no one is doing a very good job of it.  You might think that experts on tobacco use would realize all this.  (And you would be right ? experts do realize this.) As for that ?old saying?, I have never heard it before.  I googled it and the only hit for any similar sentence was this letter to the editor.  Of course, if you are making up statistics, why not make up old sayings too? But the real telling bit is in that last sentence ? that evil profit.  Because we certainly do not want big, effective, efficient corporations providing people with something that they want and that reduces their health risks.  Oh, no.  Improving people?s health has to be left to little, ineffective, inefficient activist groups, and as for making people happier ? well no one should be doing that. It was always clear that the entry of major corporations into the e-cigarette market (whether tobacco companies or otherwise), though extremely promising for public health, was going to mobilize out the anti-corporate types in opposition to THR.  (E.g., that seems to be the explanation for Glantz who had not previously attacked THR.)  Fortunately, this probably does not matter much.  But it is worth noting that when they jump in, they always seem to lead with lies.
Usually Posed Issues About Vapor cigarettes http://antithrlies.com/2013/06/19/casacolumbia-are-liars/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Page 1 of 11
Last Page | Next Page
Hosting door HQ ICT Systeembeheer