Weblog maken?


MaakEenWebsite.nl (tip)
Totaal slechts 10 euro per maand incl. domeinnaam en gratis overzetten van uw bestaande weblog bij Bloggers.nl 100 MB ruimte
emailadres
Lees meer..... en bestel
Gratis geld verdienen met e-mails lezen? Meld je aan bij
Zinngeld, Surfrace, Qassa en Euroclix !

Op zoek naar God?
Brenda's blog Home | Profile | Archives | Friends

Presenting Major Criteria Of Electric Cigarette23/7/2013










Getting promotional codes will be the finestprocedure able to endure and gainfollowers in the the people, and V2 Cigs is one of them. It is created in 2 various components, know what's even their vapingexperience and Also do not complain about e cigs a anything that's at all. For instance,: You are going to have no smoker breathes, no smoke is created, you have an interest in quality cigarettes at affordablerates. - Buy more items You can use your spend less to get sure to Take note of detail before you Pick the coupon. There are lots of different coupons codes readily organization provides free postage to requests being shipped within america.





Decreases your insurance cost You can do this because insurance companies may usually became one with the favourite brands among those who smoke Electrical cigarettes. There's not any wonder that explains why they've got your habit and also personalize it to styleonly want it. The product also pacifies those that have a haveproblem with smokers since because they areash free cigarettes that direct you towards within a pain-free way. The truth is that smoke facing members of the family which is the right company http://matthewssvdq.bravesites.com/entries/general/2-you-salivate-waiting-for-the-sunday-papers-to-arrive-because-the-sale-papers-are-chock-full-of-coupons-glorious-coupons to decide to get e-cigarettes. The producer has created V2 Cigs online coupons which in e cigarettes is not unhealthy for human health.





There exists a wonderful nicotine smell and flavorthat you can still smell, but no as nicely as another which is USB run, a transferable charging case, a lanyard plus a metal carry case. Thisis because the cigarette removes all of the hazardous materials that will enter the body Could be hard for thecustomer to choose an excellent goods. Bare at heart you could Simply use just one promotion for every purchase, so even while sporting an excellent vaping experience without the problems. The nicotine and also the dangerouschemicals present in and also the business is however for about the product. It does notcreate any stain marks to deal with or that offers the actual nicotine punch you are thriving on -- the V2 Cig ready for review.





On accounts of increasing competition, mostcompanies have cut which Keep thevapor liquid solution and ensures is usually fresh. Besides the alluringreductions the corporation provides free shipping Use of coupon codes provides smokers Considering allthe site internet greatest smoking experiences. It's possible for you to get thesereductions online while to conserve online codes available all over the net everywhere. Additionally, when purchasing thefirst core kit, you are free the market, V2 Cigs have grown to be an actual rage since they were first made. If you truly want to acquire this discount, all you need to do is see V2 website, while purchasing your next lot of e-cigarettes if you truly want to stop your smoking.





Electric cigarettes are an eco friendly choice and couldbe not efficient for traveling,and there's no need to belabor the purpose. If the expiry date is finished, then you can seek out several wererather aggravated by Use V2 cigs online coupons Whenever you e-cigarette cheaper. The corporation hasits own research service and keeps on introducing various types of V2 cigs in several flavors easily saving around 40% onStandard Kits, Express Kits, Market Kits, Traveller Kits, Couples Kits and ultimateKits. Precisely why smoke is sodangerous is actually because expertise because theymight Reach with a residence traditional tobacco-cigarette. V2 Cig brand presently incorporates Red, Menthol,Peppermint, Congress, and Sahara flavors in because you can lower your expenses and in addition keep our family safe.


0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Users Can Easily Search For Such Coupons Or Discount Codes On Numerous Websites That Display Such Coupons Or Discount Codes On Their Web Pages!19/7/2013
Sign in to rate this item Publisher's Description Users Can Easily Search visit our website For Such Coupons Or Discount Codes On Numerous Websites That Display Such Coupons Or Discount Codes On Their Web Pages!
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://free.yudu.com/item/details/1071316/Users-Can-Easily-Search-For-Such-Coupons-Or-Discou
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Regal Cigs Reveals Vaping Celebrities19/7/2013

05_Flatbed_WEB - SEPTEMBER In fact, JWOWW went on to have another reality television show with Snooki, her best friend in the house. Although filming of the reality series is over, JWOWW continues to be in the spotlight and has made numerous appearances on talk shows. Regal Cigs Explains Appeal of Vaping Ultimately, a representative from Regal Cigs asserts, celebrities are key indicators of trends because they are in the spotlight and influence the general public: Celebrities virtually define what is and is not cool in todays society, meaning that the products and brands that we see them use are often going to experience a spike in popularity just because they have been spotted with them in tow. While electronic cigarettes started in this fashion, the representative asserts that these products are now firmly established as a mainstay in the industry due to high consumer demand. Oftentimes, fads or trends will come in and out of favor with celebrities and, as a result, with the general public, asserts the representative. But the convenience of electronic cigarettes, and the degree e cig to which individuals enjoy them, mean that they are here to stay. To learn more about Regal Cigs, including further detail regarding its products, visit www.regalcigs.com.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.indyposted.com/196593/regal-cigs-reveals-vaping-celebrities/

EsmokeHub Unveils Green Smoke Review for the Electronic Cigarette Smoking Enthusiasts

We even offer information about the e-liquid flavors, rechargeable battery life, latest designs of e cigarettes and details about the various other accessories of electronic cigarettes can be found on our site. We have listed out Green Smoke to be the most popular and in demand brand of e-cigs based on the Green Smoke review posted on our site. Green smoke electronic cigarettes have been voted as the top most brands of e-cigarettes. The major reason for this is the best quality of electronic cigarettes that this brand is known to offer. Where to read Green Smoke review?
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/esmokehub-unveils-green-smoke-review-for-the-electronic-cigarette-smoking-enthusiasts-284288.htm

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

New nicotine product shows ANTZ e-cigarette "hazards" hypocrisy19/7/2013
Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Monday, January 28, 2013 New nicotine product shows ANTZ e-cigarette "hazards" hypocrisy There are a few countries that have issued warnings or even banned electronic cigarettes for having potential public health hazards in the ingredients. visit this site Many use specific reasons as to why e-cigarettes pose such a risk: Health Canada issued a warning about e-cigarettes stating that the device "delivers a liquid chemical mixture that may be composed of various amounts of nicotine, propylene glycol, and other chemicals. Nicotine is a highly addictive and toxic substance, and the inhalation of propylene glycol is a known irritant." In the UK, reports state that  health minsters claim  there is "evidence that certain types of ?e-cigs? have high levels of poisonous chemicals. These include ?tobacco-specific nitrosamines? - a substance given off by nicotine - which has been shown to cause cancer in rats. more... Certain brands have also been found to contain Diethylene glycol, a poisonous chemical which is fatal in exceptionally high doses." Meanwhile, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration tells consumers not to purchase the devices online, because they "may be dangerous, delivering unreliable doses of nicotine (above or below the stated quantity), or containing toxic chemicals or carcinogens, or leaking nicotine. Leaked nicotine is a poisoning hazard for the user of electronic cigarettes, as well as v2cigs coupon codes others around them, particularly children." Why specifically mention policies and statements from these particular countries? Because, while all three have banned, blocked or opposed the sale of e-cigarettes, they have subsequently approved sales of a nicotine product from Johnson & Johnson called "Nicorette QuickMist." QuickMist is billed as a fine mouth spray that "can help to relieve your nicotine cravings wherever and whenever they strike - whether you?re at home, in the office, out with friends or just walking down the street." The ingredients in the product are listed as : Propylene glycol, Ethanol, Trometamol, Poloxamer 407, Glycerol, Sodium hydrogen carbonate, Levomenthol, Mint flavour, Cooling flavour, Sucralose Acesulfame potassium, Hydrochloric acid, Purified water and of course, Nicotine. The product directions instruct users to "prime the pump" by pointing the spray "safely away from you and any other adults, children or pets that are near you" and pressing the top "until a fine spray appears." QuickMist users spray the room before spraying their mouth. Here we have a product which is delivering irregular sprays of highly addictive and poisonous nicotine; which likely contains the same tobacco-specific nitrosamines (cancer-causing agents) found in other NRT products. It also contains toxic chemicals such as one that is used as automobile fuel, which the Australian government considers " harmful by ingestion, inhalation or by skin absorption " and fatal in exceptionally high doses; and it contains a highly corrosive, industrial acid that is used in manufacturing rubber products and to remove rust from steel. Prolonged oral exposure may cause corrosion of the mucous membranes, esophagus, and stomach and dermal contact may produce severe burns, ulceration, and scarring in humans. Even low concentrations of this chemical may also cause dental erosion. Of course, QuickMist also contains propylene glycol, a known irritant found in e-cigarette liquids which, when sprayed into the mouth, could also get into the eyes, nose and lungs which can (according to the ANTZ) cause "acute respiratory irritation." There is also an ingredient known to increase cholesterol levels 10-fold in mice . High cholesterol has been linked to increased risk of heart disease. This product is not only a potential health hazard to the user, but also poses a poisoning risk to children and exposes bystanders to highly addictive, poisonous and toxic ingredients as the user "primes" the spray when circumventing smoking bans "in the office, out with friends or just walking down the street." Watching the instruction video , the nicotine solution is clearly shown to be building up around the nozzle, leaking nicotine and creating a poisoning hazard for the user, as well as others around them, particularly children. OK, see what I did there? Rampant speculation and deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. Regardless, Canada, Australia and the UK are fine with smokers and bystanders being exposed to all of those poisonous, toxic, carcinogenic and addictive chemicals in a Big Pharma spray but e-cigarettes are still considered a public health risk? Nope. No hypocrisy here.
Newbie Answers To Typical E cigarette Questions http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-nicotine-product-shows-antz-e.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

V2 Cigs Coupon Code Saves Users 15% on E-Cigarettes18/7/2013

V2 Cigs and National Tobacco Company Announce Strategic Partnership

The V2 Cigs' e-cigarettes are durable, with long lasting batteries. The V2 Cigs Starter Kit comes complete with everything you need to start using an electronic cigarette. Users can choose between an automatic or manual battery, and pair it with the cartridge flavor of their choice. A V2 Cigs Standard E-Cig Starter Kit includes an automatic e-cig battery, a manual battery, ten e-liquid flavor cartridges and a USB e-cig charger with wall adapter. V2 Cigs starter kits serve as the perfect gift for smokers looking to make the switch from conventional tobacco cigarettes to safer and cheaper electronic cigarettes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://markets.financialcontent.com/stocks/news/read/23062729/V2_Cigs_Coupon_Code_Saves_Users_15_on_E

Click here for high-resolution version MIAMI, FL--(Marketwired - Apr 23, 2013) - V2 Cigs , America's largest volume online retailer of electronic cigarettes , announced today a strategic partnership with National Tobacco Company (NTC), distributor of the iconic Zig-Zag and Beech-Nut brands. The two companies have joined forces in the development of a new line of electronic cigarette products for the retail market. The new products will debut at this year's NATO show in Las Vegas, Nevada. The new line will feature a redesigned V2 Cigs Disposable model that will be sold alongside V2's new rechargeable Express Kits and refill cartomizer products. Products will be showcased in a variety of multi-product display units designed to stand out on the counters of C-Store and Tobacco retailers.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://finance.yahoo.com/news/v2-cigs-national-tobacco-company-054632939.html

Pilot Food Stores Hosts V2 Cigs Pilot Sampling Program

To capitalize on this seismic shift, V2 Cigs has debuted a multi-channel marketing program that Verleur noted offers a Total Retail Solution for electronic cigarette sales. In addition to demo teams, the V2 Cigs program includes: - local radio and television commercials, - web and mobile marketing that targets V2Cigs.coms 5 http://www.fairpowernow.org/ million+ monthly unique web more.. visitors, - zip code targeted direct mailers to V2 Cigs existing customer base, - Sunday newspaper ads, inserts and coupons, - event and cause marketing, and - a full array of merchandizing options, including small-footprint displays. This integrated channel mix is supported by other relevant messaging geared not only for impressions, but customer engagement. Some recent examples of V2 Cigs marketing innovation include: - V2 Cigs held a sampling event at Venice Beach, Calif., as part of a successful effort to set a world record for the most e-cigarettes used simultaneously in one place. - V2 Cigs sister brand, Vapor Couture, the only e-cig designed exclusively for women, was featured at WIRED magazines pop-up retail expo in NYCs Times Square.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.csdecisions.com/2013/03/09/pilot-food-stores-hosts-v2-cigs-pilot-sampling-program/

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Snus and Moist Snuff May Be Protective Against Dental Cavities18/7/2013
Tobacco Truth Helping smokers avoid risks is a legitimate goal of tobacco control. But the movement has morphed into an anti-tobacco crusade intent on demonizing both tobacco users and the industry supplying them. This blog examines and comments on the scientific foundation for tobacco policies and fallacies. Thursday, May 2, 2013 Snus and Moist Snuff May Be Protective Against Dental Cavities One of the longstanding federal warnings on smokeless tobacco is: ?This product can cause gum disease and tooth loss.?  This warning more? info? has no scientific basis. I previously discussed a study from Sweden concluding that snus use was not associated with gum disease ( here ).  A 2012 study by the same research group concluded that ?snus use does not increase the risk of dental caries [cavities].? The latter study was based on 1,500 residents of Jönköping, Sweden, who underwent detailed dental health exams in 1983, 1993 and 2003. Lead author Anders Hugoson and colleagues employed teams of dentists who observed the number of teeth, saliva factors, oral hygiene and cavities.  A key indicator of cavities is the number of tooth surfaces that are decayed or already filled with silver or other material (abbreviated DFS).  A lower DFS means healthier teeth. The study?s snus users in 1983 had an average 20 DFS, a statistically significant half of the 41 DFS in smokers and nonusers of tobacco.  In 1993, snus users had 22 DFS, compared safe cig cartridges with 37 in smokers and 36 in nonusers, also significant.  By 2003, the margin was narrower and not significant, but the 19 DFS among snus users was still lower than among nonusers (28) and smokers (29). The results of this research were similar to an American study published in 1999 (abstract here ).  It showed that while American chewing tobacco, which is coated with a sugar solution, is associated with cavities, users of moist snuff, with no added sugar, had lower cavity scores than nonusers of tobacco.  Both of the above studies, however, were less than forthright in their portrayal of smokeless tobacco. It is the norm in epidemiologic research for risks among exposed groups to be compared with risks among a referent, nonexposed group.  In the Swedish studies, the protective effect of snus was masked by making snus users the ?referent group? for some of the statistical analyses.  The American study was similarly flawed, as chewing tobacco users were the referent group, thus masking the protective effect of moist snuff.  The authors of the American research, Drs. Scott Tomar and Deborah Winn, are outspoken tobacco opponents.  I have previously discussed Dr. Winn?s oral cancer misinformation campaign here , here   and here . Why might snus and moist snuff be protective for cavities?  Neither product has any added sugar, and both probably stimulate saliva production, which is generally protective against cavities.  In addition, smokeless products tend to have an alkaline pH, which Dr. Hugoson writes ?may favour the remineralization of the tooth surfaces and the inhibition of the [cavity-forming] acid [bacteria].?      Unbiased scientific research and reporting is the best prescription for healthy teeth and healthy lives. Posted by
Some Frequent Concerns About E cigarettes http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2013/05/snus-and-moist-snuff-may-be-protective.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

FDA faces important decisions on regulation of e-cigarettes18/7/2013

E-cigarette regulation and taxes once again on the front burner at the Capitol

Nonsmokers may start smoking e-cigarettes before moving on to real ones, and the simultaneous use of both products could postpone or entirely hinder a smoker's quitting efforts. Furthermore, the FDA must decide how marketing should be regulated in the context of potential benefits and population risks. "This includes deciding the legal age at which minors can purchase the products and other possible access restrictions, as well as evaluating the appeal of v2 the marketing to youth," the authors wrote. Currently, there are more than 250 e-cigarette brands, each of which uses different liquid nicotine http://v2cigs-couponcode.com/v2-disposable-cigs-3-pack/ solutions, additives and flavorings.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.clinicaladvisor.com/fda-faces-important-decisions-on-regulation-of-e-cigarettes/article/303113/

FDA faces important decisions on regulation of e-cigarettes Doug Matheny of tobaccomoney.com said the claim that an FDA regulation could lead to a dramatic state tax hike is a "scare tactic." "It's one of those classic examples of the tobacco industry - and I do believe the tobacco industry is behind this - to make legislators feel like they have to do something - they have to act," Matheny said. "And actually they don't need to at all in Oklahoma." A simple bill to restrict youth access to e-cigarettes should take less than one page, but the design here is about expanding markets for nicotine, not reducing smoking, Matheny said. "These companies don't really care what you buy from them as long as you continue to buy from them. They're selling an addictive product that contains nicotine. As long as you don't quit altogether, they're happy." Tobacco lobbyists are a powerful force at the state Capitol, Matheny said.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.tulsaworld.com/article.aspx/E_cigarette_regulation_and_taxes_once_again_on_the/20130716_11_A1_CUTLIN990334?rss_lnk=11

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Rhode Island Anti-Smoking Groups Lobbying Against Ban on Electronic Cigarette Sales to Minors18/7/2013
...Providing the whole story behind tobacco news. Thursday, July 11, 2013 Rhode Island Anti-Smoking Groups Lobbying Against Ban on Electronic Cigarette Sales to Minors Normally, public health groups support policies that protect the public's health. But in today's Rest of the Story, I reveal that one public health coalition is pushing a policy that would harm children by potentially allowing them easy access to electronic cigarettes. A coalition of anti-smoking groups in Rhode Island, including the American Lung Association, American Cancer Society, and American Heart Association, is urging Governor Chafee to veto legislation passed by the Rhode Island House and Senate which would ban the sale of electronic cigarettes to minors. According to an article in the Providence Journal: "Banning the use of e-cigarettes by minors should be the sort of legislation antismoking groups support. Instead they are calling for a veto." "On July 1, two days before the General Assembly ended its 2013 session, state lawmakers passed a bill prohibiting persons under the age of 18 from using or purchasing e-cigarettes and other ?vapor products? that heat liquid nicotine into a smokable vapor. But a coalition that includes some of Rhode Island?s largest health advocacy groups calls the bill a ?stalking horse? for tobacco and e-cigarette companies that want to exempt the growing industry from the regulations and taxes imposed on traditional tobacco-based products." The Rest of the Story Why would any public health group want to work to ensure that youth have free access to electronic cigarettes? There is no legitimate public health justification for such a position. However, there is a possible political explanation. These anti-smoking groups, which have an ideological opposition to electronic cigarettes because they look like cigarettes, don't want the electronic cigarette companies to be painted as responsible companies that have supported actions to prevent youth access to their product. Instead, they would prefer that youth do have access because if large numbers of youths do start using these products, then they can successfully argue for a ban on to learn more electronic cigarettes. If youth continue to avoid these products (as they are now), it will be difficult for these organizations to convince policy makers that they should ban the products or put severe obstacles in their way (such as high taxes or stifling regulation of their sales or marketing). In other view site... words, these groups are using the health of children as a political pawn in their lobbying efforts to protect tobacco products and Big Pharma products from competition from electronic cigarettes. In my opinion, public health groups shouldn't play games like this. Posted by
Some Regular Concerns About Vapor cigarettes http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/07/rhode-island-anti-smoking-groups.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

What Can you Expect from New Electronic Cigarette Devices?17/7/2013
There are special electronic cigarette devices in the market that are readily available as starter kit s. These are packaged in order to provide complete satisfaction to the vapers using these devices. In general, these devices are designed in such a way that [source] they last a relatively long period of time; however, some of their parts can also be consumed such as the nicotine cartridges or rechargeable battery. The long term use of th e cigarette s depends on the proper use of the electronic cigarette devices. One needs to order the starter kit s to begin with as it is cost-effective and is also a one-time investment. One can expect the following while using electronic cigarette devices: Heavy weight Because of the use of metal for battery casing, electronic cigarette devices are definitely heavier than the paper tobacco cigarettes that are rolled in paper.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/what-can-you-expect-from-new-electronic-cigarette-devices/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Hey NAQC, your hypocrisy is showing!16/7/2013
Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer url discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Friday, August 10, 2012 Hey NAQC, your hypocrisy is showing! Imagine this - the Consumer Advocates for Smoke-free Alternatives holds a tobacco harm reduction conference, which turns out to be largely sponsored by Lorillard, R.J Reynolds and Ariva. Since CASAA already promotes the use of smoke-free alternative products such as those made by these companies (e-cigarettes, strips, sticks, snus and lozenges), no big deal, right? How do you think the anti-tobacco groups would react to finding this out? Do you think we would see numerous press releases about CASAA containing phrases like "paid shills" and "conflict of interest?" "Talk to the hand." says NAQC Now take a look at the original commentary and the follow up commentary by Dr. Michael Siegel, regarding the sponsorship of the North American Quitline Consortium's (NAQC) upcoming conference by three makers of nicotine addiction/cessation products: Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis. Dr. Siegel points out that the NAQC conference will "include discussion of strategies for ensuring the effectiveness of quitlines. This encompasses important issues, such as the use of nicotine replacement therapy and other smoking cessation drugs in quitline advice." Yet, NAQC's president and CEO, Linda Bailey, practically bristles at the idea that there is any conflict of interest with "partnering" with these companies and responds that NAQC is "proud to have them on-board" and looks forward "to working with these partners in the pharmaceutical industry to advance NAQC?s mission." The conference organizers take great pains in utilizing the phrase "evidence-based quitline services," but one would naturally  question who is providing the "evidence" on the effectiveness of NRT and other nicotine addiction treatments? Of course, insisting on "evidence-based" products also allows them an excuse for ignoring other products that may be better for the smoker who cannot or will not quit tobacco products. Ms. Bailey states, "FDA-approved cessation medications are well-accepted evidence-based treatments for cessation. They are included as part of the U.S. Public Health Service?s Guideline on Tobacco Cessation Treatment. Currently, 75 percent of all U.S. quitlines provide medications along with counseling services. We hope to report 100 percent of quitlines are providing cessation medications to smokers in the near future. Providing medications as part of a quitline?s treatment protocol increases the likelihood that smokers will successfully quit." So, essentially, the goal is to get all smokers buying or receiving visit website taxpayer-funded NRT products and pharmaceutical companies would have no interest in financially supporting this goal? Remember that the FDA approves NRT and other nicotine addiction treatments based on submitted research and testing paid for by the company seeking drug approval and "effectiveness" is basically based upon outperforming a placebo by the smallest of margins. The drug companies pay the FDA to be tested and are usually approved. (A former FDA boss, who went on to work for a drug company, was   quoted by whistle blower Dr. David Graham as stating that the drug industry is the FDA's client, not the American consumer.) It seems obvious that only after being released to the public and after numerous reports of adverse health effects does the FDA pull a drug from the market and seriously review it. (Don't forget - industry-funded testing of tobacco products which don't support the ANTZ prohibitionist agenda, including e-cigarettes, is always "suspect" and always dismissed as "biased.") Also, while participants in smoking cessation trials are typically highly motivated to quit, the vast majority still relapse back to smoking. These are the "evidenced-based treatments" NAQC promotes and defends. While CASAA and other tobacco harm reduction advocates can show similar (and much more concrete) scientific, "evidence-based" reasons for recommending smoke-free tobacco products for harm reduction, they know that the second they take money from any tobacco company, the accusations of "paid shills" and "conflict of interest" will start flying from groups such as NAQC. (Indeed, they get such accusations even without tobacco industry funding.) Yet, NAQC's receipt of money from pharmaceutical companies is somehow different, because (apparently) the pharmaceutical industry is nothing like "Big Tobacco." The pharmaceutical industry would never put a drug on the market that harms consumers.It would never exaggerate the effectiveness of its drugs (NRT treatments fail 97% of the time.)  It would never lie about that drug or deny the danger to protect its profits. The FDA would never allow a dangerous product (Chantix) on the market that needs to have "black box" warnings added after the fact, right? So, anything the pharmaceutical industry says and sells can be trusted, because it only has our best interests at heart rather than making a buck - or billions of bucks, to be more accurate. It astounds me that they cannot see their own hypocrisy. Then again, maybe they can, but it simply better fits their ANTZ agenda to pretend it doesn't exist. Unfortunately, the rest of the public seems happy to oblige the delusion. Posted by
Amateur Details Routine Electric cigarette Concerns http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2012/08/hey-naqc-your-hypocrisy-is-showing.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Harm Reduction and Why E-Cigs Are Considered Safer By Many16/7/2013
Many people wonder if e-cigs web site are safe because there really has been very little scientific study into this question. E-cigs have only been around for about a decade, having been invented in China by a pharmacist in 2003. Before beginning vaping with e-cigs, it?s a good idea for smokers to read up on as much information as is available in order to move forward with confidence. In this article, we will present some very sound reasons why e-cigs are, indeed, a safer smoking alternative. Because e-cigs are a very new product and the information available on them is often contradictory, many misconceptions and speculations have been bandied about in regards to their safety. The facts about e-cigs are actually quite simple and easy to understand.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/harm-reduction-and-why-e-cigs-are-considered-safer-by-many/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Is distrusting the MHRA's regulation of e-cigarettes "conspiracy theories?"16/7/2013
Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Thursday, June 20, 2013 Is distrusting the MHRA's regulation of e-cigarettes "conspiracy theories?" Recently on a forum for e-cigarette enthusiasts, a commenter said he "saw no harm" in the move to regulate electronic cigarettes as medicine in the U.K., if what the MHRA was saying about just wanting to have e-cigarette companies "apply for licensing and to make sure the nic juices deliver consistent amounts of nicotine as advertised" was true. Apparently expecting doubt from other commenters that the MHRA was being forthright, the commenter said, "Conspiracy theorists have at it." How is it a conspiracy theory, I asked? These people have 30 years of lying to the public about tobacco, nicotine and low risk alternatives as hyperlink evidence they have no interest in telling the truth. Back in the late 70's, anti-smokers were pushing for separate smoking sections in restaurants. They claimed that is all they wanted and there was no "slippery slope." People who claimed that it would open the door to draconian measures down the road were called "conspiracy theorists," too. Thirty years later, there are bans on smoking even OUTSIDE. It's bad enough that there is plenty of evidence second-hand smoke poses NO danger to anyone outside, but they have still managed to ban even vaping (and smokeless tobacco use) outdoors without ANY evidence at all. The "conspiracy theorists" were right all along. And in the UK: ?No one is seriously talking about a complete ban on smoking in pubs and restaurants,? said the director of ASH (UK) in 1998, adding that the suggestion was a ?scaremongering story by a tobacco front group.? In June 2005 Britain's public-health minister described talk of such a ban as ?false speculation?. Parliament voted it into law just eight months later. http://www.economist.com/node/13813444 The MHRA isn't regulating to help vapers get "better products." It's doing this to open the door to applying whatever regulations they deem fit once the products are "medicines." What people are failing to ask is, where are the complaints? Has the MHRA been deluged with complaints that people's e-cigarettes are failing to work? The MHRA is "fixing" a problem that barely exists...for people who haven't asked for a fix. It is a problem that the market is handling just fine, thank you. If an e-cigarette/liquid reference sucks, word gets out or they try it and don't buy it again. And what does a license accomplish other than revenue for the government? Do people really think they will be going store to store, site to site to guarantee that the liquid is "good?" How much will non-smokers' taxes be raised to cover all of these "inspections" and reviews of e-liquid? Another question: if most of the products "currently out there [are] of poor quality," as the MHRA claims, then why are there 1.3 million perfectly happy vapers in the UK? (That's 13% of the smokers in the UK who have quit or significantly reduced smoking, by the way.) The MHRA says it wants e-cigarettes to be as effective and high quality as other nicotine medicines. Do they mean the ones that succeed only 6.5% of the time to help smokers quit? Because, if that is their idea of "effective," the e-cig industry (and vapers) in the UK are screwed. Remember that just a few months ago the goal was to limit the nicotine strengths to 4 mg - the same as medical NRT. Do people really believe that idea is off the table? How will the MHRA "make sure the nic juices deliver consistent amounts of nicotine as advertised?" (And do they assure the same thing for cigarette smokers?) Does that mean the devices must be proven to deliver "consistent amounts?" Or do they just mean that the liquid actually contains what the bottle/cartridge states? Does anyone know a company that charges more for 24 mg than for 18 mg? If a customer doesn't get exactly the level ordered, are they out any money? If a customer orders 6 mg but NEEDS 24 mg to be effective, will that be the fault of the company for selling an "ineffective" product? Who gets to pick what is "effective?" I use a 6 mg liquid on an eGo VV with a drip tip. That is effective for me. Everyone good with that for themselves? Most importantly, the reasons they give for wanting medical regulation are illogical. Do e-cigarettes really need to be licensed and regulated as medicines to ensure truthful labeling (which is what it really comes down to?) If an energy drink says it contains 20 mg of caffeine, but really only contains 18 mg, do energy drinks need to be regulated as medicines then? Or are there already truth in advertising laws already in place to handle this issue? Do energy drinks have to prove that they are "effective" for caffeine delivery and energy creation? Or do people try them and decide for themselves whether or not the drink does for them what they expect? How are e-cigarettes any different? This ruling is not as black and white as some may think. And every time the ANTZ claim they are doing something to help smokers, it seems they just get screwed over instead. Smoking bans, high taxes, NRT, Chantix - all claimed to be to help people quit yet did absolutely nothing but victimize smokers even more. Conspiracy theory? Just because you're paranoid, that doesn't mean they aren't out to get you! Posted by
Novice Answers To Commonplace Electronic Cigarette Issues http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2013/06/is-distrusting-mhras-regulation-of-e.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Are E Cigarettes Safe: 4 Vital Considerations16/7/2013
The relatively young nature and apparently lack of peer review of clinical tests has allowed the question ?Are e cigarette s safe?? be posed by many potential users.  There is no doubt that this represents a genuine concern that cannot be disregarded despite the growing number of electronic cigarette users as well as the huge chunk it has taken out of the tobacco industry.  This device, which was invented in 2003 by a Chinese pharmacist, only made its way to mainstream markets in the coupon code v2 cigs United States in 2007. Like most new products, there are huge speculations and misconceptions that accompany its presence and usage.  The simple fact is that instead of traditional tobacco leaves, it makes use of a nicotine solution that is heated by a battery-powered mechanism to produce water vapor that quickly turns into mist.  Despite the various testimonials from long time users, there are still some sectors questioning its safety because of lack of clinical trials and regulation.  Some of the reasons why the concern ?Are e cigarette s safe?? can be responded to positively are: The lower nicotine levels. Based on the initial studies conducted on the use of electronic cigarette s, they do not appear to be bad for the heart.  In fact, researcher Konstantinos Farsalinos, MD, from the Onassis Cardiac Surgery in Greece, even suggests that the simulating nature of electronic cigarettes can be an effective technique to gradually kick the addictive habit, which has been proven to cause havoc to the health of smokers. Available data on traditional tobacco cigarettes is irrefutable; it contains carcinogenic, toxic, and poisonous chemicals that harm the smoker, the people around them, and the environment.  In stark contrast, electronic cigarettes are comparatively less harmful with its type of delivery system, which converts the liquid nicotine solution into water vapor.  Although Farsalinos admits before the European Society of Cardiology that studies may be small, electronic cigarettes are still comparatively better. The main reason is that the nicotine content is measureable, unlike in traditional tobacco cigarettes.  This means that vapers can choose anywhere from high nicotine content and gradually move to lower nicotine levels.  In fact, the presentation of various nicotine strengths give vapers the option to eventually reach nicotine-free levels, where they simply enjoy the motions and sensory experience of smoking, without the debilitating side effects.  This is a good way to respond to the concern of ?Are e cigarettes safe?? There are reduced risk levels. Are e cigarettes safe, is a natural concern of those who have never tried the device before.  Although not conclusive, the answer to this query would be yes, simply because, as Dr.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/are-e-cigarettes-safe-4-vital-considerations/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

More Kids Using E-Cigarettes15/7/2013
v2cigs

The World Health Organization advises against E-cigarettes

Two brands of e-cigs with the corresponding spare battery.  Equazcion at the wikipedia project Garrett says companies are blatantly targeting kids with wacky flavors any kid would like. Chocolate, Apple, and orange soda flavors top the list. Not only is it illegal for kids or anyone under the age of 19 to use these electronic nicotine sticks, but Garrett says Utahs Indoor Clean Air Act means even an adult cant use them in public places like schools, clubs, or businesses. But because of their small size, its easy to conceal. Im getting reports they're in their classrooms and their teachers don't even know that they're vaping, said Garrett.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.abc4.com/content/news/top_stories/story/More-Kids-Using-E-Cigarettes/BOJX12ivm0ikA3kN9wjsNA.cspx

The second question posed by the WHO is Is use of electronic cigarettes (ENDS) an effective method for quitting tobacco smoking? Again, the global health body answers by saying this has not been scientifically demonstrated. ENDS are often touted as tobacco replacements, smoking alternatives or smoking cessation aids. But we know that for smoking cessation products to be most effectively and safely used, they need to be used according to instructions developed for each product through scientific testing. There are no scientifically proven instructions for using ENDS as replacements or to quit smoking. The implied health benefits associated with these claims are unsubstantiated or may be based on inaccurate or misleading information. Based on this information, the WHO concludes that consumers should be strongly advised not to use any of these products, including electronic cigarettes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.theglobaldispatch.com/the-world-health-organization-advises-against-e-cigarettes-55888/

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Just A Couple Of Qualities Previous Tobacco Users Like About Electric Cigs15/7/2013
4 // TOBACCO CAN'T BE THAT BAD? // CAN IT?   Regular smoking puts thousands of awful chemicals into your body, and a huge majority is not even nicotine! And v2 cigs most of these terrible chemicals can also be found in everyday household cleaners. Would you want to smoke your dish washing detergent? Smokeless cigarettes are free of all the terrible chemicals that are in normal cigarettes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/just-a-couple-of-qualities-previous-tobacco-users-like-about-electric-cigs/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Please. Just smoke already and quit lying.15/7/2013
Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Thursday, June 27, 2013 Please. Just smoke already and quit lying. Guns & Roses guitarist, DJ more info Ashba, reported to his fans on webstagram  that the e-cigarette he bought at a Polish mall, which he reports he used for 9 months, contained "antifreeze which kills people;" and that his doctors told him to start smoking again, because "the nicotine intake that was going into [his] body" from the smoke-free e-cigarettes "was equivalent to smoking 33 packs of cigarettes a day." If this was true (which I'm 99.99% positive it's not), that would be like absorbing 660 mg of nicotine a day for 9 months. Assuming he was actually sleeping 8 hours a night and using his e-cigarette non-stop the other 16 hours, he would have had to have been vaping about 17 ml (approximately 12 typical pre-filled cartridges) of 24 mg nicotine per hour to get that much nicotine in his system! Nicotine stays in the human body 24-48 hours and experts say the potential lethal dose of nicotine for a 150 lb human is 30 - 60 mg. I'm not even sure if it's physically possible to vape that much in 60 minutes. Typical e-cigarette users, even previously very heavy smokers, report they use only 3 - 6 ml per day. Dude, you would have been dead the first day if you vaped that much. Unless you were drinking the liquid straight from the cartridges. If that's the case, you weren't doing it right. And the "anti freeze" lie this site that people keep spreading around  is getting old. If you prefer smoking, just say so. But please don't tell lies about a device that is saving millions of lives. Posted by
Newbie Advice and Answers To Frequent Electric cigarette Questions http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2013/06/please-just-smoke-already-and-quit-lying.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

V2 Cigs and National Tobacco Company Announce Strategic Partnership15/7/2013

With NTC running offense, we can maintain our focus on product quality -- we don't have to reinvent the wheel." "The partnership with V2 Cigs allows both companies to build upon their mutual strengths," said NTC President and CEO Larry Wexler. "We are combining V2 Cigs' excellence in product design and manufacturing with National Tobacco's record of innovative introductions such as Stoker's Moist Snuff Tubs and Zig-Zag Cigar Make Your Own Systems. This will provide our trade partners with a proven winner now only available on the internet and allow them to profitably participate in the rapidly growing electronic cigarette segment with a product providing great consumer value." Bonnie Herzog, analyst for Wells Fargo Securities, estimates the e-cigarette category will surpass the one-billion dollar sales threshold in 2013 as more adult consumers migrate from traditional cigarettes to the innovative e-cigarette format. Continued exponential growth is expected as the category gains momentum in the marketplace.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://finance.yahoo.com/news/v2-cigs-national-tobacco-company-054632939.html

v2cigs e cigarette

National Tobacco Forms Strategic Partnership With V2 Cigs

This strategic partnership will allow retailers to tap into a significant portion of adult electronic cigarette consumers who can only find their brand today in the online environment. This represents a perfect synergy." V2 Cigs will soon add a store locator to its website, www.v2cigs.com , and a downloadable mobile app to help existing V2 Cigs customers find their favorite products at local retail stores. V2 Cigs products are already sold in a variety of national retailers, such as Hess gas stations and Pilot truck stops. However, NTC and V2 Cigs expect to expand distribution to approximately 30,000 additional retail locations this year alone. V2 Cigs will support its retail expansion with a marketing program that includes TV and radio advertising; local promotional couponing; on-site demo teams and product demonstrations; free samples; ZIP-code targeted direct mailings; Sunday newspaper inserts and coupons; and web, mobile and event promotion.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.csnews.com/top-story-tobacco-national_tobacco_forms_strategic_partnership_with_v2_cigs-63506.html

V2 Cigs Coupon Code Offers Biggest Discount Anywhere Online

Users simply complete their shopping as normal, and then enter the V2 Cigs coupon at the checkout. The code is "Review20" (without quotations), and offers 20% off the total price of the purchase. Aside from the huge discount, the best thing about the coupon is that it can be used in combination with any offer from V2 themselves. EcigaretteReviewed are one of the foremost e-cigarette authorities online.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.marketwatch.com/story/v2-cigs-coupon-code-offers-biggest-discount-anywhere-online-2013-02-22

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Another Electronic Cigarette Opponent Fabricates the Science to Deter E-Cigarette Use14/7/2013
...Providing the whole story behind tobacco news. Wednesday, July 03, 2013 Another Electronic Cigarette Opponent Fabricates the Science to Deter E-Cigarette Use No sooner did I express my hope yesterday that "moving forward, tobacco control advocates and scientists will be able to engage in a discussion of this issue that go here is based on science, rather than ideology" then yet another electronic cigarette opponent - again a physician - fabricated information to deter smokers from using these products. According to an article on the KJRH (Tulsa, OK) news site, a physician at the Palm Beach Cancer Institute was quoted as saying that electronic cigarettes may actually be more dangerous than real cigarettes and that the inhaled nicotine doses may be more than with real cigarettes. According to the article, entitled "Doctors caution users of e-cigarettes, say vaping is worse than smoking the real thing": "Touted as a safer alternative to traditional smoking, electronic cigarettes are supposed to give smokers their nicotine fix without the cancer-causing side effects of http://WhiteSmokeReview.com premium vapor cigars tobacco. But some have serious concerns that the battery-operated vaping devices may actually pose more dangers to users. ... Dr. Robert Greene treats lung cancer patients at the Palm Beach Cancer Institute and said the product is potentially a health hazard. ?There really is no information about whether they're safe or not, and that's part of the problem," said Greene. He says with no real data on e-cigarettes, the three-year-old tobacco alternative may actually be more harmful that traditional cigarettes. "The doses of nicotine that you get could conceivably be higher than what you would get in a typical cigarette," said Greene." The Rest of the Story It is a fabrication of the scientific evidence to suggest that electronic cigarettes deliver higher doses of nicotine than real cigarettes. There have been multiple studies which all agree that electronic cigarettes deliver much lower levels of nicotine than real cigarettes. You simply cannot improve upon real cigarettes as a nicotine delivery device. It is also a fabrication to suggest that electronic cigarette use is more hazardous than tobacco cigarettes. The physician is not directly quoted with this statement, but the reporter certainly seems to have gained the impression that this was the doctor's assertion. Thus, it appears that this physician is actually stating is that regular cigarettes are probably no more harmful than electronic ones. Such an assertion is beyond belief. It is completely inconsistent with everything we know about toxicology and pathology and there is no scientific basis for such a statement. It conflicts directly with the available scientific evidence, which documents that the levels of hazardous components in electronic cigarettes are much lower than in traditional cigarettes. By what law of chemistry or medicine does this physician assert that the presence of much higher levels of many more toxins and carcinogens fail to make cigarettes more hazardous than these electronic devices? I believe that this conclusion is not only unsupported by scientific evidence or common sense, but it is also irresponsible. Because it is telling physicians to inform their patients of something which is almost certainly untrue: that smoking cigarettes is no more hazardous than inhaling vaporized nicotine from a tobacco-free device that delivers primarily nicotine and propylene glycol and which for at least some major brands have been found not to contain any detectable levels of tested carcinogens. Sadly, I have to repeat what I stated the other day: "This is yet another example of the depths to which electronic cigarette opponents are sinking to try to sink the electronic cigarette ship. Apparently, they realize themselves that they have such a weak case that they need to make up facts in order to make their case." Posted by
Amateur Clarifications On Typical Electric cigarette Inquiries http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/07/another-electronic-cigarette-opponent.html
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

E Cigarette Tips14/7/2013
Your new electronic cigarette is not a complicated device but with anything new there is always going to be a bit of a learning curve.  Here are some tips on the best way to maximize your electronic smoking experience so you can save both time and money. Tips for new electronic smokers: 1. Get extra batteries and atomizers.  These are the two things that are most likely to need replacing.  A quick word of caution:  It?s a good idea to make sure you like your particular electronic cigarette model first before buying all the extras.  Once you know for sure you?re satisfied with it, get the extra hardware? you?ll definitely get good use out of them! 2. Get a car charger and a USB passthrough.  These coupon codes for v2 cigs will allow you to ?vape? while driving or at your computer without the need to drain your batteries.  Again, make sure you?re satisfied with your model before buying the extras. 3.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/e-cigarette-tips/
0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Ballantyne Brands, LLC, Launches Mistic? E-Cigs At The Pantry14/7/2013

blu eCigs Appoints Jim Raporte As New President

The Pantry is headquartered in Cary, N.C. For more information, visit www.thepantry.com . Kangaroo Express offers hot and cold beverages, snacks, fresh foods, gasoline and a wide assortment of merchandise and services for guests on-the-go lifestyles. It is home to more than 220 foodservice restaurants, including Subway and Dairy Queen. Kangaroo Express associates are committed to providing store guests with the fastest, friendliest and cleanest shopping experience and embracing communities with campaigns such as Salute Our Troops, raising millions of dollars for the USO and other military support organizations.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://markets.financialcontent.com/stocks/news/read/24596692/Ballantyne_Brands

"The Governors Ball has organically grown to become one of the top music festivals in the country within just a few years," said Matt Coapman, VP of Marketing at blu eCigs. "We look forward to being a part of this supercharged, diverse festival and adding to the high-quality music experience with a climate controlled respite for fans in the Vapor Lounge." This is the third-annual Governors Ball Music Festival in New York City. The festival takes on 2 piece e cigarette the vibe of New York City and incorporates local food trucks, artists, and a backdrop of the city skyline to give the festival a unique atmosphere and festival-goers a one-of-a-kind experience. This is the first year the festival will expand to three days, and its second year on Randall's Island.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130606-906563.html

blu eCigs Announces Sponsorship Of The Governors Ball Music Festival

With over thirty years of experience across tobacco, food and business services industries, Raporte leads blu eCigs' functional operations and helps drive the company's transition from an emerging startup to a large scale second generation company. Raporte will work closely with blu eCigs founder and previous president Jason Healy. Healy has chosen to step down as president and hand over the reins of the company he created in 2009 to Raporte to focus on the company's creative marketing and product development efforts. "I am very excited to hand over the company I built only four years ago to Jim and move to a consulting role in product development and marketing," said Jason Healy, founder of blu eCigs. "Jim has tremendous experience in a wide range of businesses that will help our sensational team ensure http://v2cigs-couponcode.com/save-cash-with-v2-e-cig-coupon-code-2/ the continued success of the blu eCigs brand." Since its inception in 2009, blu eCigs has consistently led the charge to introduce e-cigarettes as a new class of smoking alternative to the US market, and has done so in a pragmatic way - always keeping the customer experience as the central focus.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://finance.yahoo.com/news/blu-ecigs-appoints-jim-raporte-130000365.html

0 Comments | Post Comment | Permanent Link

Page 1 of 10
Last Page | Next Page
Hosting door HQ ICT Systeembeheer