Weblog maken?


MaakEenWebsite.nl (tip)
Totaal slechts 10 euro per maand incl. domeinnaam en gratis overzetten van uw bestaande weblog bij Bloggers.nl 100 MB ruimte
emailadres
Lees meer..... en bestel
Gratis geld verdienen met e-mails lezen? Meld je aan bij
Zinngeld, Surfrace, Qassa en Euroclix !

Op zoek naar God?
Linda's blog

Home - Profile - Archives - Friends

EU vote on electronic cigarettes 'makes no sense'

Posted on 19/7/2013 at 07:31 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

EU vote on electronic cigarettes However, the revision of the EU 'Tobacco Products Directive' would classify most e-cigarettes as a medicinal product, despite the fact that in the UK alone 25 percent of all attempts to kick the habit are made using e-cigarettes, making them the most popular aid. The European Commission had proposed that e-cigarettes containing 4 milligrammes or more of nicotine must be classed as medicinal products but an EU parliamentary committee went further, voting to classify all e-cigarettes as pharmaceuticals, regardless of the nicotine content. Users of e-cigarettes (known as vapers) have protested, arguing that through e-cigarettes they were able to kick the tobacco habit. They say classifying them as medical devices will mean they must undergo a costly and protracted authorisation processes before marketing.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10178573/EU-vote-on-electronic-cigarettes-makes-no-sense.html

NJOY: The E-Cigarette That Aims To Snuff Out Smoking

Robin Mermelstein, UIC health behavior researcher: We know very little about e cigarettes. They are increasingly popular. So there is a desperate need for us to http://www.ecigchic.com/ learn more about why people are using them, what theyre getting out of them and what people think about them. University of Illinois at Chicago health behavior researcher Robin Mermelstein and her team have been awarded a $2.3 million federal grant to investigate how young adults use alternative smoking products. Robine Mermelstein: People might use it as a type of a replacement and transition all the way from traditional combustible cigarettes to these non-combustible e cigarettes. But, if people just use them and it prolongs your dependency and makes it harder to quit, we dont know.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://wgntv.com/2013/07/18/chicagoans-help-on-electronic-cigarettes-study/

Chicagoans help on electronic cigarettes study

Thats also why the FDA had approved nicotine gum and patch for over-the-counter use and the FDA is not in the business of approving deadly drugs. 70% of smokers want to reduce the amount they smoke, or quit altogether. But according to studies by the Centers for Disease Control, only 6% are able to quit. That 6% is replaced by new people entering the category. As a result, the number of Americans who smoke has remained consistent.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.forbes.com/sites/marcbabej/2013/07/18/njoy-the-e-cigarette-that-aims-to-snuff-out-smoking/


New nicotine product shows ANTZ e-cigarette "hazards" hypocrisy

Posted on 19/7/2013 at 01:05 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Monday, January 28, 2013 New nicotine product shows ANTZ e-cigarette "hazards" hypocrisy There are a few countries that have issued warnings or even banned electronic cigarettes for having potential public health hazards in the ingredients. Many use specific reasons as to why e-cigarettes pose such a risk: Health Canada issued a warning about e-cigarettes stating that the device "delivers a liquid chemical mixture that may be composed of various amounts of nicotine, propylene glycol, and other chemicals. Nicotine is a highly addictive and toxic substance, and the inhalation of propylene glycol is a known irritant." In the UK, reports state thatá health minsters claim áthere is "evidence that certain types of ?e-cigs? have high levels of poisonous chemicals. These include ?tobacco-specific nitrosamines? - a substance given off by nicotine - which has been shown to cause cancer in rats. Certain brands have also been found to contain Diethylene glycol, a poisonous chemical which is fatal in exceptionally high doses." Meanwhile, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration tells consumers not to purchase the devices online, because they "may be dangerous, delivering unreliable doses of nicotine (above or below the stated quantity), or containing toxic chemicals or carcinogens, or leaking nicotine. Leaked nicotine is a poisoning hazard for the user of electronic cigarettes, as well as others around them, particularly children." Why http://WhiteSmokeReview.com best cartomizer for v2 e cig specifically mention policies and statements from these particular countries? Because, while all three have banned, blocked or opposed the sale of e-cigarettes, they have subsequently approved sales of a nicotine product from Johnson & Johnson called "Nicorette QuickMist." QuickMist is billed as a fine mouth spray that "can help to relieve your nicotine cravings wherever and whenever they strike - whether you?re at home, in the office, out with friends or just walking down the street." The ingredients in the product are listed as : Propylene glycol, Ethanol, Trometamol, Poloxamer 407, Glycerol, Sodium hydrogen carbonate, Levomenthol, Mint flavour, Cooling flavour, Sucralose Acesulfame potassium, Hydrochloric acid, Purified water and of course, Nicotine. The product directions instruct users to "prime the pump" by pointing the spray "safely away from you and any other adults, children or pets that are near you" and pressing the top "until a fine spray appears." QuickMist users spray the room before spraying their mouth. Here we have a product which is delivering irregular sprays of highly addictive and poisonous nicotine; which likely contains the same tobacco-specific nitrosamines (cancer-causing agents) found in other NRT products. It also contains toxic chemicals such as one that is used as automobile fuel, which the Australian government considers " harmful by ingestion, inhalation or by skin absorption " and fatal in exceptionally high doses; and it contains a highly corrosive, industrial acid that is used in manufacturing rubber products and to remove rust from steel. Prolonged oral exposure may cause corrosion of the mucous membranes, esophagus, and stomach and dermal contact may produce severe burns, ulceration, and scarring in humans. Even low concentrations of this chemical may also cause dental erosion. Of course, QuickMist also contains propylene glycol, a known irritant found in e-cigarette liquids which, when sprayed into the mouth, could also get into the eyes, nose and lungs which can (according to the ANTZ) cause "acute respiratory irritation." There is also an ingredient known to increase cholesterol levels 10-fold in mice . High cholesterol has been linked to increased risk of heart disease. This product is not only a potential health hazard to the user, but also poses a poisoning risk to children and exposes bystanders to highly my website addictive, poisonous and toxic ingredients as the user "primes" the spray when circumventing smoking bans "in the office, out with friends or just walking down the street." Watching the instruction video , the nicotine solution is clearly shown to be building up around the nozzle, leaking nicotine and creating a poisoning hazard for the user, as well as others around them, particularly children. OK, see what I did there? Rampant speculation and deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. Regardless, Canada, Australia and the UK are fine with smokers and bystanders being exposed to all of those poisonous, toxic, carcinogenic and addictive chemicals in a Big Pharma spray but e-cigarettes are still considered a public health risk? Nope. No hypocrisy here.
Frequently Posed Questions Regarding Vapor cigarettes http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-nicotine-product-shows-antz-e.html

ANTZ CHECK #4: There is no (scientific) evidence

Posted on 18/7/2013 at 12:21 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Stop the ANTZ Discussing tobacco and nicotine consumer discrimination, unethical nanny state laws, harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, snus, personal vaporizers, Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association, Smokefree Wisconsin and other smoke-free topics. Tuesday, October 2, 2012 ANTZ CHECK #4: There is no (scientific) evidence Follow myá "ANTZ Check" Series áas I "fact check" the various ways the ANTZ (Anti Nicotine and Tobacco Zealots) deceive the public about smoke-free alternatives. Each ANTZ Check will be for one specific lie to keep it short and simple (and easy to link to if you are in a debate or just looking for facts.) RATING: B*** S*** LIE THE LIE: The ANTZ continue to claim that there is "no evidence" that e-cigarettes are safe and/or effective smoking cessation products or safer than smoking. The phrase "scientific evidence" is often used so they can later dismiss any evidence that doesn't fit their definition of "scientific." "No evidence exists to show they help people quit smoking." - American Cancer Society "You think e-cigs help you quit real cigarettes. There's no evidence of this." - Kentucky Center for Smoke-free Policy There is no scientific evidence that e?cigarettes are safer for consumers than regular tobacco products...Like the ?light? and ?low tar? cigarettes that tobacco companies claimed were healthier for consumers, there is no evidence to back up the claims made by e?cigarette makers." - American Lung Association "...there is no evidence that the electronic cigarette helps smokers to quit smoking." - World Health Organization ANTZ CHECK: This lie actually utilizes some of the other lie tactics, such as clever phrasing, but to state that there is "no evidence" is just completely untrue. The ANTZ just choose not to acknowledge or accept much of the evidence based on their own standards and expectations. Many add the word "scientific" in order to "truthfully" ignore evidence which does not come from peer-reviewed research or 20-year-long clinical studies. (Note: No product has ever been required to undergo 20+ years of study in order to be deemed reasonably safe by the FDA.) A bit of Truth Twister lie is used regarding e-cigarettes used as smoking cessation products. 1) In the case of evidence of e-cigarettes being "safe and effective" as a smoking cessation products, the ANTZ completely ignore reports from real consumers. This may have been a valid claim when only a few dozen or a couple hundred [source] smokers reported (source) quitting smoking completely using an e-cigarette, but after nearly 4 years on the U.S. market, thousands upon thousands of smokers are reporting that they have been able to quit using traditional cigarettes - without any reports of serious adverse effects. The ANTZ ignore these reports as "unscientific," because they did not originate from carefully selected test subjects in an unrealistic, clinical environment. However, as the Chantix controversy showed, the real data about a product often comes after a product has been released into real-world environments that have many more variables. 2) Even with the very real evidence from real-life reports, the ANTZ seem to define a smoking cessation product as "effective" only if it results in complete abstinence from nicotine and tobacco. However, according to the CASAA E-cigarette User Survey , 79.6% of respondents did not even purchase their e-cigarette for that purpose! Nearly 65% expected the e-cigarette to allow them to continue to have a "smoking" experience, but with reduced health risks. Just 16.5% stated they would be likely to attempt to quit "cold turkey" or use another nicotine cessation product if they did not have access to e-cigarettes. For most e-cigarette consumers, "effective" is defined as "no longer smoking traditional cigarettes," not "complete nicotine abstinence."áTherefore, it makes no sense to insist that these products provide evidence that they work the same as pharmaceutical nicotine cessation products, because that is not the intended purpose of the product nor is it the reason that most smokers buy them. 3)áThe American Cancer Society website states , "What in cigarette http://WhiteSmokeReview.com pure smoke cartonizer smoke is harmful? Cigarette smoke is a complex mixture of chemicals produced by the burning of tobacco and its additives. The smoke is made up of more than 4,000 chemicals, including over 60 known to cause cancer. Some of these substances cause heart and lung diseases, and all of them can be deadly...Cigarette smoke also contains tar and the poison gases carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide." The often-quoted FDA report áprovided authoritative evidence that the e-cigarettes tested either did not contain most of the chemicals found in cigarette smoke and/or the very few chemicals they did find were at barely detectable levels. These results have been reproduced in subsequent tests. How is that notá"scientific evidence" that e-cigarettes couldn't possibly have the same health risks as smoking? You would have a hard time convincing people thatáif you have one product that contains a lot of "dangerous stuff" and an alternative product that doesn't contain most of that "dangerous stuff," but instead contains mostly "safe stuff," that the latter wouldn't be "less dangerous" or "safer" than the former. It's called "common sense." 4) Below are some of the studies and tests that provide "scientific evidence" about e-cigarettes that the ANTZ insist don't exist. Note that some of these small studies/tests were publicized as being sufficient "evidence" to conclude that e-cigarettes were likely dangerous to the public, even though the similar studies/tests that failed to show any reason to suspect e-cigarettes would pose any health risks are dismissed as inconclusive or accused of being biased: (Those are just some of the tests and clinical studies that exist about e-cigarettes.áCASAA posts research and tests as they become available to the publicáat:á http://casaa.org/Electronic_Cigarettes.html )á CONCLUSION: The claim that there is "no evidence" or "no scientific evidence" available about e-cigarettes is obviously completely false. I rate this lie to be a complete B*** S*** Lie. ANTZ Check Lie icons: A Toxic Shocker: Using negative comparisons and analogy to make something sound more dangerous than it really is. Often uses scary-sounding chemical names. A B*** S*** Lie: Absolutely untrue, no evidence whatsoever to support the claim. A Truth Twister: Presenting facts in such a way that something that could just as easily be seen as positive is presented only as negativeáor a careful use of specific words to change the focus of a discussion. An Ego Booster: Relying on an authoritative or respected reputation to give the impression that an opinion or theory is a known fact. You must believe what they say solely because they are someone "important."
Smokeless cigarette FAQ For Newbies http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2012/10/antz-check-4-there-is-no-scientific.html

About Us

Posted on 18/7/2013 at 03:01 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Although electronic stop smoking coupons cigarettes have taken the market by storm, some people are still confused about how to buy their first electronic cigarette . This website, White Smoke Review , was established to bring expert knowledge and shed light on both the best brands and models of e cigarettes and also provide all sorts of useful information, tutorials, guides and resources on the subject. It is our intent to bring our users the answers they are looking for, and advise consumers on the best and most proven e cigarette s on the market. Electronic cigarette s have become a very popular alternative to smoking in recent years. There are now over 300 different brands of electronic cigarettes to choose from. It is understandable that consumers are a little overwhelmed by all this choice, and confused when it comes to picking the right electronic cigarette for them.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/about-us/

V2 Electronic Cigarettes Get Great Reviews, But Are They Safe?

Posted on 18/7/2013 at 01:05 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

V2 Electronic Cigarettes As little is known about the long-term effects, the FDA has issued warnings to distributors of e cigarettes. There are currently no studies concluding whether electronic cigarettes are safe for intended use. It is unknown what, if any, potentially harmful chemicals are inhaled when using the products. The FDA also has concerns that their use may lead to the use of traditional cigarettes or other products containing tobacco. Until more is known about the harmful effects, e cigarette users are taking a certain risk.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.inquisitr.com/803157/v2-electronic-cigarettes-get-great-reviews-but-are-they-safe/

Unbiased Electronic Cigarette reviews of V2 cigs Revealed by DigitalSmoke.org

The cost of 5 pack, 20 pack and 40 packs of cartridges is $ 9.95, $ 34.95 and $ 64.95 respectively. V2 Shorty cig, V2 standard cigs, V2 long cigs are the batteries offered by this brand. V2 standard cigs is the most demanding and best selling e cigarette battery says reviews. V2 long cigs have extra long battery life.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.emailwire.com/release/127874-Unbiased-Electronic-Cigarette-reviews-of-V2-cigs-Revealed-by-DigitalSmokeorg.html

V2 Cigs Coupon Code Saves Users 15% on E-Cigarettes

The V2 Cigs' e-cigarettes are durable, with long lasting batteries. The V2 Cigs Starter Kit comes complete with everything you need to start using an electronic cigarette. Users can choose between an automatic or manual battery, and pair it with the cartridge flavor of their choice. A V2 Cigs Standard E-Cig Starter Kit includes an automatic e-cig battery, a manual battery, ten e-liquid flavor cartridges and a USB e-cig charger with wall adapter. V2 Cigs starter kits serve as the perfect gift for smokers looking to make the switch from conventional tobacco cigarettes to safer and cheaper electronic cigarettes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://markets.financialcontent.com/stocks/news/read/23062729/V2_Cigs_Coupon_Code_Saves_Users_15_on_E

V2 cigs E Cigarette Accessories Reviewed As Best says DigitalSmoke.org

Its true that the customers who are trying V2 cigarette first time in their life, they do not ant o switch to other brands ever in their life says reviews. This is one of the best electronic cigarette brands that provide all the essential products to the smokers that enhance their vaping experience. Before selecting the brands, it is http://v2couponcode.weebly.com/ good for smokers to read e cigarette reviews offered by DigitalSmoke.org. About Digitalsmoke.org Digitalsmoke.org is on a mission to become established as the number one electronic cigarette reviews site on the web. If one is fed up with review sites that show obvious bias to particular brands without ever getting to the heart of the matter, then one is the right place.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.emailwire.com/release/127683-V2-cigs-E-Cigarette-Accessories-Reviewed-As-Best-says-DigitalSmokeorg.html


Tobacco Harm Reduction: Hope in the U.S., Despair in Europe

Posted on 18/7/2013 at 00:04 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Tobacco Truth Helping smokers avoid risks is a legitimate goal of tobacco control. But the movement has morphed into an anti-tobacco crusade intent on demonizing both tobacco users and the industry supplying them. This blog examines and comments on the scientific foundation for tobacco policies and fallacies. Thursday, June 27, 2013 Tobacco Harm Reduction: Hope in the U.S., Despair in Europe In my commentary, ?The Electronic Future of Cigarettes,? published last week in The Atlantic,á I described ??a radical transformation in the way our society uses tobacco?as tobacco consumers switch to smoke-free products like smokeless tobacco and e-cigarettes.?á One of my longstanding goals has been to correct decades of misinformation about nicotine and tobacco, in order to introduce safer smoke-free products to millions of smokers.á The Atlantic article, available here and reproduced below, conveys a hopeful message, but optimism in the U.S. is offset by depressing events in Europe.á The British Government two weeks ago decided to regulate e-cigarettes as medicines ( here ), a move that will likely deter wider e-cig adoption by smokers.á The European Union continues to move forward with its tobacco directive, which denies vastly safer snus to all but Swedish smokers and places further restrictions on e-cigarettes.á A blistering public health critique of the European Commission, the European Council and the Irish Presidency, the World Health Organization, the European public health lobby and various governmental health organizations is offered by Clive Bates in his recent web post ( here ). á The Electronic Future of Cigarettes Aiming for a tobacco-free society is myopic. Embrace the safer alternative. Brad Rodu The Atlantic, June 20, 2013 We are on the cusp http://WhiteSmokeReview.com vlotecigerette of a radical transformation in the way our society uses tobacco. Cigarette consumption is in substantial, protracted decline as tobacco consumers switch to smoke-free products like smokeless tobacco and e-cigarettes. This isn't America's first large-scale change in tobacco habits; in the early 1900s, cigarettes replaced chewing tobacco. This is, however, the first shift with a promising public health outcome. The reason is simple science: Smoke-free tobacco and nicotine products are around 98 percent safer than traditional cigarettes .á The evidence has been mounting for a long time. Iápublishedá my first scientific studies áon vastly safer smoke-free cigarette substitutes almost 20 years ago.áBritain's Royal College of Physicians, one of the world's oldest and most prestigious medical societies,á reported in 2002 : "As a way of using nicotine, the consumption of non-combustible [smokeless] tobacco is on the order of 10-1,000 times less hazardous than smoking, depending on the product." The report continued with an even bolder statement, acknowledging that some smokeless manufacturers may want to market their products "as a 'harm reduction' option for nicotine users, and they may find support for that in the public health community." In 2007, the Royal College challenged governments to consider "...that smokers smoke predominantly for nicotine, that nicotine itself is not especially hazardous, and that if nicotine could be provided in a form that is acceptable and effective as a cigarette substitute, millions of lives could be saved." Big tobacco companies are already adapting to the demand for smoke-free tobacco. Altria, the largest American cigarette manufacturer, will sell e-cigarettes throughout Indiana in August. Number two Reynolds American believes that "governments, public health officials, tobacco manufacturers and others share a responsibility to provide adult tobacco consumers with check it out accurate information about the various health risks and comparative risks associated with the use of different tobacco and nicotine products." Reynolds sells Snus, a smokeless tobacco product that has produced an extraordinarily low smoking rate in Sweden, under its flagship Camel brand. Reynolds also introduced dissolvable tobacco products, and it owns a pharmaceutical company that sells nicotine gum. In July Reynolds will start selling its Vuse e-cigarettes in Colorado. Lorillard, the nation's third largest cigarette maker, is taking an aggressive smoke-free posture in the public policy arena as it promotes its Blu e-cigarette brand. Lorillard CEO Murray Kessler wrote , "We see e-cigarettes as a product that has the potential to play a critical role in the national harm reduction discussion and affords our company a http://WhiteSmokeReview.com best cartomizers seat at the table in this debate." Sadly, the potential of tobacco harm reduction is threatened by opposition from many major medical organizations and government agencies. Obsessed with a myopic vision of a tobacco-free society, they have transformed a legitimate war on smoking into a moral crusade against tobacco, a mistake that was tragically made with alcohol almost 100 years ago. Congress has prohibited tobacco marketers from any communication with smokers regarding safer alternatives without the express approval of the FDA. So far, the agency has taken a hard line, claiming , falsely, that, "To date, no tobacco products have been scientifically proven to reduce risk of tobacco-related disease, improve safety or cause less harm than other tobacco products." The agency is defying a key element of its stated mission - "to provide the American public with factual and accurate information about tobacco products." In an effort to kill the nascent smoke-free market, the FDA is slow-walking development of necessary regulations. In March 2012, it signaled the extraordinary lengths that companies will have to go to in order to have a product accepted as "modified [i.e., reduced] risk. In essence, the agency will require dozens of new studies on minute product details and human effects, which will likely take a decade or more. This is regulatory fundamentalism, a bureaucratic maze that will condemn e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products, and therefore tobacco harm reduction, to purgatory. With this delay, cigarettes will continue to dominate the American tobacco market, and 440,000 more Americans will die from smoking-related disease every year. One thousand two hundred and five deaths. Every. Single. Day. The body of highly credible research and roster of public health experts endorsing tobacco harm reduction continues to grow, providing more science-based support for smokers to switch. In the absence of rational FDA regulation, nicotine-addicted smokers would do well to quit cigarettes and avail themselves of the many smoke-free harm reduction products that are currently on the market. Posted by
Some Frequent Questions About E cigs http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2013/06/tobacco-harm-reduction-hope-in-us.html

7 Things To Expect From New Electronic Cigarette Devices

Posted on 16/7/2013 at 22:38 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

New electronic cigarette devices normally come in starter kits that are packaged in such a way that vapers will have almost everything they need to ensure an extremely satisfying vaping experience.á It is important to point out though that although electronic cigarettes are designed to last for a relatively long time; some of its components are considered consumable, like in the case of the nicotine cartridges, and even the rechargeable battery. Ordering the best e cigarette starter kit for your needs is considered the best option for new vapers because they provide the most savings, especially if the intention is to use the device for a substantially long time.á The cost of the starter kit is an initial cost that will eventually pay for its own over time.á The key is to understand how to use electronic cigarette devices properly so that they can last click here! as they are designed to.á There are some things that vapers can expect with their new electronic cigarette devices. áá á?áá áHeavier weight It is reasonable to expect electronic cigarette devices to be heavier compared to their traditional tobacco cigarette counterparts.á This is primarily because of the metal material used for the battery casing, which is definitely heavier than the paper used to house the tobacco leaves.á Although heavier in weight, it is necessary to point out that it can still be conveniently held with just two fingers. áá á?áá áDifference in taste One of the most glaring things to expect from new electronic cigarette devices is the difference in taste.á Unlike traditional tobacco cigarettes that have powerful flavors, those of the electronic cigarettes have a smoother delivery.á This is even if vapers choose traditional flavors like tobacco and menthol, which are closest to those of traditional tobacco cigarettes. There are also a variety of non-conventional flavors like fruits and other concoctions.á Normally, the flavors are derived from ingredients that are naturally produced and artificial sources that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as fit for human consumption. áá á?áá áVapor instead of smoke With traditional tobacco cigarettes, harmful tobacco smoke is produced, which contains at least 4,000 toxic chemicals that can put the health of smokers as well as those around them in danger.á Using new electronic cigarette devices, vapor instead of smoke is produced, which is characterized by its odorless and harmless property.á It also does not contain any harmful chemicals that can harm other people.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/new-electronic-cigarette-devices

ANTZ CHECK #5: E-cigarettes will lead to smoking

Posted on 16/7/2013 at 15:18 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

EGO BOOSTER THE LIE: E-cigarettes will not only cause ex-smokers to resume smoking, but will also act as a "gateway" to smoking for youth. "...by simulating the cigarette experience, electronic cigarettes might reactivate the habit in ex-smokers. They could also be a gateway into tobacco abuse for young people who are not yet hooked." - Dr. Harvey Simon, Harvard Health ?It is clear from [C.S. MottChildren?s Hospital National Poll on Children?s Health] that U.S. adults are not waiting for scientific evidence of adverse health effects of e-cigarettes before before asking v2 cigs ingredients that they be regulated and restricted. Rather, they support restrictions on e-cigarettes based on potential risks?not just immediate health effects, but also the possibility that e-cigarettes may lead youth toward later use of tobacco cigarettes.? - Matthew M. Davis, director of poll & associate professor of pediatrics and internal medicine in the Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit at the U-M Medical School. "The FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the American Academy of Pediatrics have all voiced their concern that electronic cigarettes could lead to an increase in nicotine addiction and youth tobacco use." - Center for Public Health and Tobacco Policy ANTZ CHECK: Because there is no way to prove these claims, we must believe the "experts" simply on their "say-so." However, the fact that they are even putting forth these ridiculous theories shows just how little these "experts" really know about the product they are trying to ban. 1) Smokers who quit smoking already have a very high likelihood of relapse. áThose who quit by using gums and patches have a relapse rate of 93% or more. (That means they start smoking again.) Additionally, for reasons still unknown to the "experts," relapses frequently happen even if the smoker hasn't smoked for years and couldn't possibly still be addicted to nicotine. Therefore, it is extremely likely that any "ex-smokers" drawn to e-cigarettes were already considering smoking traditional cigarettes but decided to try e-cigarettes instead. In that case, the e-cigarettes will have actuallyáprevented the ex-smoker from resuming smoking. If the smoker likes the e-cigarette, he will not switch to traditional cigarettes, he will continue to use the e-cigarette until he decides to quit again. If he does not like the e-cigarette, he quit using it or will start smoking again. Either way, it's not the e-cigarette use that will cause an ex-smoker to start smoking again. 2) As smokers who switch quickly find out, using an e-cigarette (popularly known as "vaping," rather than smoking) is actually quite different from the "habit" of smoking. Instead of a long periods of abstinence, followed by 10-15 minutes of smoking, most e-cigarette users find that they will just take a few puffs from the device as needed throughout the day. It actually works more like a slow-release nicotine patch, by providing an even keel throughout the day instead of periodic, high spikes of nicotine intake (since most smokers will smoke an entire cigarette, even if they don't need that much nicotine, just to psychologically "make it" until their next break.) 3)áPropylene glycol, the base of most e-cigarette liquids, is slightly sweet, which is why it is also used as a base in products such as medicines and drink mixes. This is also why many smokers don't like the artificial tobacco flavors and switch to using a flavor that tastes good in a sweeter base, such as fruit, sweets or beverage flavors. Because of this dramatic change in flavors, a significant number of e-cigarette consumers find that the taste of real cigarette smoke has become extremely unpalatable to them. It simply doesn't taste good to them anymore and they much prefer their mint, cherry or coffee flavor now. It becomes one more deterrent to returning to traditional cigarettes. Given this fact, it seems extremely unlikely that non-smoking youth would start using "candy-flavored" e-cigarettes ( see ANTZ CHECK #2 regarding "candy" flavors and youth ) and suddenly decide to start smoking harsh-tasting real cigarettes, which most smokers will tell you are an acquired taste to begin with. It's like suggesting that kids who drink sweet-tasting Mountain Dew will suddenly want to switch to bitter, black espresso for site web their caffeine fix. (Note: Most of the same arguments above can also be made for smoke-free tobacco alternatives. There is no reason or evidence that people who start using smoke-free tobacco products (especially mild, pleasantly-flavored brands) would want or need to "graduate" to smoking - unless the ANTZ get their way and they http://WhiteSmokeReview.com south beach cartomizer life ban sales of all tobacco products except cigarettes.) CONCLUSION: "Save the children" is a popular tactic for ANTZ. However, not only is there no evidence that youth are even choosing to use e-cigarettes over traditional cigarettes, the idea that kids who experiment with e-cigarettes would suddenly want to smoke is completely illogical. Clues that there is no evidence that this is a risk are words the ANTZ use such as "may" and "could." They count on the fact that people will rely on opinions from people who are self-proclaimed "experts," rather than any actual evidence. It's scaremongering, pure and simple. I rate this lie to be an Ego Booter. ANTZ Check Lie icons: A Toxic Shocker: Using negative comparisons and analogy to make something sound more dangerous than it really is. Often uses scary-sounding chemical names. A B*** S*** Lie: Absolutely untrue, no evidence whatsoever to support the claim. A Truth Twister: Presenting facts in such a way that something that could just as easily be seen as positive is presented only as negativeáor a careful use of specific words to change the focus of a discussion. An Ego Booster: Relying on an authoritative or respected reputation to give the impression that an opinion or theory is a known fact. You must believe what they say solely because they are someone "important."
E cigarette Frequently Asked Question For Fledglings http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2012/10/antz-check-5-e-cigarettes-will-lead-to.html

Four Things That Make E Cigarettes Safer

Posted on 16/7/2013 at 10:32 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

With these devices being so new to the market and due to the lack of clinical tests, many people ask the question, Are e cigarettes safe? This is an important question because the number of electronic cigarette users increases daily and they have captured a large part of the tobacco industry. Though invented in 2003 by a Chinese pharmacist, they only came available in the United States markets in 2007. There is confusion by some about how these devices actually work. They do not use traditional tobacco , but v2 coupon instead use a nicotine solution that is heated by the battery-powered heating unit to produce a harmless water vapor that dissipates into a mist. Some still ask, Are e cigarettes safe?
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/four-things-that-make-e-cigarettes-safer/

ANTZ CHECK #3: Not a safe alternative to smoking

Posted on 16/7/2013 at 03:12 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

THE LIE: E-cigarettes and smoke-free tobacco blog url products are not a safe alternative to smoking. "Don't be fooled into thinking an e-cigarette is a safe alternative to smoking" - Dr. Jeff Engel, North Carolina Health Director "There is no scientific evidence that e-cigarettes are a safe substitute for traditional cigarettes or an effective v2 cigs e cigarettes smoking cessation tool" - Russ Sciandra, American Cancer Society "You can call chewing tobacco by whatever name you want ? smokeless tobacco, spit tobacco, chew, snuff, pinch or dip ? but don't call it harmless." - Mayo Clinic "Just because there is no smoke, doesn't mean that smokeless tobacco is safe." - National Cancer Institute ANTZ CHECK: Here is the "twist." There is a difference between "safe" and "safer." It seems that the only people who expect átobacco and nicotine alternatives to be safe (ie. without any risk whatsoever) are the ANTZ - even though that same standard of "100% safe" is not applied to the vast majority of products we use every day. 1) By using the word "safe," the ANTZ avoid having to admit that smoke-free tobacco and nicotine products ácontain a tiny fraction of the potentially carcinogenic chemicals that can be found in smoke. 2) Their own statistics ásuggest that a greater percentage of smokers than smoke-free users suffer from so-called "tobacco-related" diseases and death. Note the lack of death statistics and types of disease on the CDC Smoke-free tobacco page compared to the its Smoking web page . 3) The greatest health risk increase associated with tobacco use is lung cancer , which health groups attribute to smoke exposure. Since smoke-free users do not inhale smoke, that should mean the greatest danger of tobacco use is eliminated - thereby reducing a significant health risk, ie. making it "safer." 4) The CASAA E-cigarette User Survey reported that nearly 80% of the respondents did not intend to use the device to achieve complete abstinence from nicotine and approximately 81% of that group expected "reduced health risks," not 100% safety. 5) FDA-approved smoking cessation products are not even expected to be "safe." In fact, consider that Chantix and electronic cigarettes came on the market at about the same time and there have been thousands of MedWatch complaints about serious adverse reactions and hundreds of deaths linked to Chantix. However, electronic cigarettes have been linked to no deaths and no serious adverse reactions have been reported. Health groups have been reported as stating that the benefits of quitting smoking outweigh the risks of taking Chantix, yet they still call for e-cigarettes to be removed from the market until they can be proven "safe." CONCLUSION: Not only is the expectation that e-cigarettes and smoke-free tobacco products be proven "safe" unrealistic, they are also being hypocritical and unethical by making the public believe that is a reasonable or common standard to set. By purposely avoiding the discussion of relative risks and twisting the meaning between "safe" and "safer," the ANTZ knowingly let millions of smokers believe the health risks associated with e-cigarettes and smoke-free tobacco are exactly the same as smoking. go!! Their own statistics indicate that is not the case. I rate this lie to be a Truth Twister. ANTZ Check Lie icons: A Toxic Shocker: Using negative comparisons and analogy to make something sound more dangerous than it really is. Often uses scary-sounding chemical names. A B*** S*** Lie: Absolutely untrue, no evidence whatsoever to support the claim. A Truth Twister: Presenting facts in such a way that something that could just as easily be seen as positive is presented only as negative or a careful use of specific words to change the focus of a discussion. An Ego Booster: Relying on an authoritative or respected reputation to give the impression that an opinion or theory is a known fact. You must believe what they say solely because they are someone "important."
E cigarette Frequently Asked Question For Novices http://wivapers.blogspot.com/2012/10/antz-check-not-safe-alternative-to.html

More Kids Using E-Cigarettes

Posted on 15/7/2013 at 21:44 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Electronic cigarettes: No smoking, but lots of v2 cig discount code fuming

And experts say its against the law and could lead kids down a dangerous path. Unlike regular cigarettes, electronic cigarettes dont have the regulations or the studies to give us more information. But health experts say Big Tobacco is using them to target kids. Were just teaching you stay away from anything that could be addicting in anyway, said parent Catherine Mower.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.abc4.com/content/news/top_stories/story/More-Kids-Using-E-Cigarettes/BOJX12ivm0ikA3kN9wjsNA.cspx

Might kids be attracted to a product enjoyed by the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio? "So far, there is no evidence that kids find this particularly cool," Siegel says, though that "could change." Even when it's technically allowed, some e-cigarette users avoid vaping in social situations. "I just don't feel comfortable going into public places and vaping, because it looks like you're smoking," says Brian Worthy, owner of the Vapor-Mart in Los Angeles. He doesn't read this want to upset bystanders, so he vapes only indoors at his home or store. Many vapers aren't particularly worried that their habit might be outlawed in public places.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/06/health/la-he-ecigs-20130706


Top E-Cig Tips When Choosing The Best Electronic Cigarette Kit For You

Posted on 15/7/2013 at 20:03 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Best Electronic Cigarette Tips: Avoid three piece technology (with the one caveat: at least until you really know what you are doing and then only if you are well and truly bitten with the vaping bug and become obsessed beyond reason or rationality!). The electronic cigarette ?s atomizer must work perfectly to deliver superior performance and give the user a good experience. Since atomizers are sensitive, they should be replaced often to maintain good vapor. This is one of the reasons we recommend a two-piece electronic cigarette , where the atomizer is replaced v2 cigs ingredients every time the cartomizer is changed. This automatic replacement of the atomizer provides great vapor production minimizes leaks, and provides ultimate reliability and performance. Here are the 3 most important considerations when you chose the best electronic cigarette for you: 1) Long Battery Life ? Don?t be disappointed by a brand that needs frequent recharging.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/top-e-cig-tips-when-choosing-the-best-electronic-cigarette-kit-for-you/

E-cigarettes are NOT banned in Canada

Posted on 15/7/2013 at 12:15 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

You know the old canard ? if it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck and looks like a duck its probably a duck? Well, what we have here in more... Canada is the opposite. Though Health Canada acts as though there is a ban, suggests there is a ban, and though just about everybody in this country refers to the current situation as a ban, there really is no ban. E-cigarettes are not a health product. They are a recreational consumer good and as such do not fall under the Food and Drugs Act . Nicotine replacement therapies (pharmaceutical nicotine products used for the purpose of quitting smoking) make therapeutic claims and therefore are covered under the act. E-cigarettes make no such claims. Despite the fact that many smokers have switched to e-cigarettes, vendors do not claim that their products aid cessation. They also do not claim their product, or nicotine, has any health benefits. Users do make those claims but policy is based on what producers claim and how the product behaves rather than what people say it does for them. For example I could be a smoker who took up scuba diving. The more time I spent underwater the less I smoked. After a while the desire to smoke lessened more and more and I eventually quit. I could tell you that I quit smoking through scuba diving but it does not make scuba diving a quit smoking therapy. Granted that interpreting where e-cigarettes should be categorized can be a little confusing since they are rather unique in that they are both like and unlike cigarettes, smokeless nicotine products and nicotine inhalers. What makes them really unique is that they deliver enough nicotine to satisfy smokers who are not trying to quit. There is a strong advisory on the Health Canada website that has been interpreted as a ban. There is also an additional document aimed at potential vendors in which you see that though they claim e-cigarettes fall under their jurisdiction they refer to them as ?health products?. Market authorization is granted by Health Canada following successful review of scientific evidence demonstrating safety, quality and efficacy with respect to the intended purpose of the health product. In addition, the delivery system within an electronic smoking kit that contains nicotine must meet the requirements of the Medical Devices Regulations. Apart from the point that you require a therapeutic claim to be made to be classified as a ?health product?, I think many vapers though they certainly believe their e-cig is healthier than smoking still do not consider it a ?health product? nor would they think of it as a ?medical device?. E-cigarettes are a consumer product and as such are governed by guidelines of consumer protection (safety standards, product labelling, quality control). In many ways consumers are more fully protected there than under Health Canada guidelines. In fact, in the UK, US and in Canada too (see the ECTA site ), e-cigarette vendors have banded together to create standards of excellence for the product and marketing guidelines (no selling to minors, no health claims).(See this ECITA post on how nicotine replacement therapies would not pass the standards required of consumer products ? it is a British context but roughly similar to the Canadian). The wording of the advisory is harsh but the strongest evidence for this not being a real ban is the behavior of Health Canada when someone appeals one of their cease and desist letters. One courageous vendor has stood up to Health Canada (HC) and remains in business. On a recent VapeCast this vendor, who openly sells e-cigarettes via a website, reported on their experience with threats from HC. They received cease and desist letters and said that when they asked HC for the specific law that was being broken HC would not furnish that information. A little time would pass and then HC would send another letter with another argument. These actions ran the gamut from cease and desist to getting customs to seize product. If there was a legitimate ban in place all they would have had to do was cite the law and take the vendor down. It appears that while they are saying there is a ban there really isn?t. The problem is that if you think there is a ban then you start acting as though there is. Many vendors have switched to selling non nicotine e-cigarettes (Health Canada does not seem to have a problem with those as ?medical devices?) or have simply closed their doors. And though it is easy enough to say that everyone should stand up for the cause, in Canada, almost of these companies are too small to muster the resources that they think might be required. There is a lot more to say about this. Stay tuned. This will be a recurring topic on the site. Bullying by Health Canada is depriving smokers of a safer alternative to using nicotine ? it is saying in no uncertain terms that smoking is the preferable route. If you have a story about an experience dealing with Health Canada on this issue leave a comment or send electronic cigarette facts me an email describing it and I will report it (I am happy to keep it as anonymous as you wish).
Newbie Answers To Routine Vapor cigarette Inquiries http://smokles.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/e-cigarettes-are-not-banned-in-canada/

Electronic cigarettes: No smoking, but lots of fuming

Posted on 15/7/2013 at 09:39 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Amid growth for e-cigs, Europe cracks down

In the California Senate, lawmakers recently approved a bill that would ban vaping from every place smoking is already prohibited. The measure awaits discussion in the Assembly. UCLA has already taken that step, outlawing e-cigarettes on April 22, the same day it shut out their smoky cousins. The laws would prevent vapers like 30-year-old Alexis, a Vapor Spot customer who did not want to share her last name because her family doesn't know she ever smoked, from inhaling in her acting classes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.latimes.com/health/la-he-ecigs-20130706,1,6037080.story

blu eCigs Announces Sponsorship Of The Governors Ball Music Festival

Britain also is planning to regulate electronic cigarettes as non-prescription medicines beginning in 2016. The new rules are being approved after Lorillard Inc. (NYSE: LO), the nationas third largest cigarette maker, recently received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to sell two new menthol cigarette products. Greensboro-based Lorillard, which bought the blu eCigs electronic cigarette company last year, also has increased national retail distribution of the product from 12,000 outlets at the time of the acquisition to more than 80,000 today.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bizjournals.com/triad/blog/2013/07/at-a-time-of-growth-for-triad.html

Lorillard eCigs leading in market share

Monday, Jul. 15, 2013 Lorillard eCigs leading in market share Blu brand, with 37.2 percent in June, overtakes NJOY Lorillard eCigs leading in market share Winston-Salem Journal Richmond Times-Dispatch A Wells Fargo Securities analyst said blu eCigs from Lorillard Inc. appear to have taken the top market share for electronic cigarettes from NJOY. E-cigs are battery-powered devices that heat a liquid nicotine solution in a disposable cartridge and create a vapor that is inhaled. It has launched an estimated $40 million marketing campaign for the devices.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.timesdispatch.com/business/tobacco-industry/lorillard-ecigs-leading-in-market-share/article_0888ab01-a1ba-569f-aff5-831a54911f95.html

Can electronic cigarettes help smokers kick the traditional habit? Festival-goers are invited to stop in the air-conditioned blu eCigs Vapor Lounge that will feature device charging stations to http://www.slideshare.net/evaporizing/v2-cigscom-promo-code-save-15-now stay connected throughout the music festival, an animated social media photo booth, and surprise guest appearances by some of this festival's top performers. Adult smokers will also have an opportunity to sample a blu eCigs(R) disposable electronic cigarette in their choice of Classic Tobacco or Magnificent Menthol flavors. "The Governors Ball has organically grown to become one of the top music festivals in the country within just a few years," said Matt Coapman, VP of Marketing at blu eCigs. "We look forward to being a part of this supercharged, diverse festival and adding to the high-quality music experience with a climate controlled respite for fans in the Vapor Lounge." This is the third-annual Governors Ball Music Festival in New York City.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130606-906563.html


White Smoke Review ? Our Mission

Posted on 15/7/2013 at 05:53 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Unless you've been reading a site internet lot about electronic cigarette s lately, you might think that the whole subject is a bit confusing. Your wouldn't be alone! Data from the FDA (the Food & Drug Administration), E-Cig producers , and ?vapers? (E-Cig consumers) can differ greatly. A few experts, even some MD's like the fantastic Dr. Seigel state that E-Cigs can help people who want to cease smoking standard cigarettes , and you probably have a great deal of curiosity regarding these statements. Serious online research yields both good and bad E-Cig reviews that also include different kinds and brand names of E-Cigs.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/white-smoke-review-our-mission/

Electronic cigarettes: No smoking, but lots of fuming

Posted on 14/7/2013 at 20:32 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

PNoy urged to ban e-cigarettes

But thus far, no studies have shown that large amounts of dangerous chemicals are released into the air, says Dr. Michael Siegel, a professor at the Boston University School of Public Health. "Unlike tobacco smoke, the vapor dissipates very quickly," he says. "It looks like it's probably very minor risk." However, there is a social risk, Bialous points out, in that vapers drawing on stick-like objects and web link puffing out a smoke-like substance looks a lot like smokers, and may serve to normalize the habit again.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/06/health/la-he-ecigs-20130706

Mar Roxas to ban the sale of electronic cigarettes. In a statement, PMA President Dr. Leo Olarte said electronic cigarettes is an alternative vice and should not be considered as legitimate therapy to stop smoking addiction. We urgently appeal to President Benigno Aquino III and his government to immediately address this new but clear and present danger of electronic cigarettes to the health of the nation most especially our children. Our young ones can easily be enticed and duped into smoking by these novelty devices, he said.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/07/13/13/pnoy-urged-ban-e-cigarettes

E-cigarette maker targets Colorado

Pat Senecal, director of health policy and systems at San Juan Basin Health Department in Durango, said Friday that the Federal Drug Administration is worried about test marketing and availability of e-cigarettes. The FDA has no regulatory authority yet over e-cigarettes, so the risks arent known, Senecal said. E-cigarettes have flavoring, and studies of other tobacco products show that flavoring appeals to youths. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment said in a statement Friday: Too much remains unknown about the potential health risks of these new nicotine products. We are concerned that the tobacco industry is introducing yet another product to Coloradans that is addictive and potentially harmful to their health. Also known as personal vaporizers, e-cigarettes broke into the American market six years ago.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://durangoherald.com/article/20130713/NEWS01/130719776/-1/News01/E-cigarette-maker-targets-Colorado-


The Last Refuge: Duke Center for Smoking Cessation Still Accepting Funding from Philip Morris, and Not Prominently Disclosing It

Posted on 13/7/2013 at 19:07 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

That last bastion is the Duke Center for Smoking Cessation . To my surprise, I just found out that the Duke Center for Smoking Cessation will be funded by Philip Morris - on a no-cost extension basis - through May 31, 2014 . This means that contrary to my previous understanding, the Duke Center for Smoking Cessation is still funded by Philip Morris. The rest of the story is that since 2004, Duke has continuously served as a public relations arm for Philip Morris, accepting $37 million in funding from Big Tobacco to help the nation's leading tobacco company http://WhiteSmokeReview.com best brand cartomizer achieve its marketing goal of legitimizing itself as a corporation sincerely interested in helping smokers to quit. And Duke continues to serve that role today. Note that according to the agreement between Duke and Philip Morris, the director of Duke's nicotine research center (or a designee) became a formal part of Philip Morris' public relations efforts, by virtue of appointment to the Advisory Board of the company's "smoker cessation support initiative." The rest of the story is that rather than being a model for tobacco control for the nation, Duke is http://WhiteSmokeReview.com 808 cartomizers versus 510 instead an example of exactly the opposite. It is perhaps a model, but a model for the most egregious violation of medical ethics. Duke allowed itself and its reputation and good name to be used as a public relations ploy for a tobacco company. Duke allowed itself to be used as a pawn in the public relations and marketing strategy of Philip Morris. By associating its name with that of Duke University, Philip Morris used Duke to gain public relations marketing value from that association. This is public relations 101. Using corporate funding to secure public credibility and respect. It was part of Philip Morris' (and the other tobacco companies') playbook for decades. The rest of the story is that Duke continues to undermine its own scientific integrity and that of academia as a whole by allowing itself to serve as a pawn in the tobacco industry's public relations and marketing strategy. A university - and especially a medical ebay e cigarette center - should not play a role in marketing the most deadly consumer product. But that is exactly what Duke will continue to do, well into the year 2014. Rather than being recognized as a model for tobacco control, Duke should instead be entered into the Hall of Shame as a medical center that puts money over ethical integrity.á And to make matters worse, the Center still does not prominently disclose its massive funding from Philip Morris - or the fact that this funding continues at the present time and will continue into next year. There is still no disclosure on the Center's home page, which is the appropriate place for such a disclosure. The sole disclosure on the website is a new page called "Timeline" which graphs the historical funding for the Center. But readers are unlikely to navigate to this page unless they have a specific interest in the history of the Center. Even on this page, the link to the document which reveals the continuation of the funding into 2014 is so small that you almost literally need a magnifying glass to see it. (Even with my new $400 "progressive" lenses, I didn't even notice this link until my fourth viewing of the page.) Moreover, members of the public who are being recruited to be human subjects in Center research are not readily informed of the current Philip Morris funding. You can go through the entire online screening process and still not have any idea that you are being asked to participate in a smoking cessation study by an academic center that is funded by Big Tobacco! I would think that if many members of the public found this out, they would be outraged. Particularly those who have lost loved ones to cancer or other diseases caused by Big Tobacco products.á Even if they are informed later in the enrollment process, I find the failure to disclose the Big Tobacco funding up front to be a travesty, as well as an ethical breach. The same holds for the failure to disclose the Big Tobacco funding for the Center on its home page. Posted by
Electronic Cigarette FAQ For Beginners http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-last-refuge-duke-center-for-smoking.html

How to Get Electronic Cigarettes for Free

Posted on 13/7/2013 at 18:36 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

You may think that it is not possible to v2 e cigarette get free electronic cigarette s, but you would be mistaken. You may find yourself wondering why a company would give away their products for free. The answer to this question is simple. Companies offer free trials or free samples of their products in order to let consumers try their products. These companies are confident that you will like their products so much that you would be willing to buy them. There are many different ways that you can obtain a free electronic cigarette .
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://whitesmokereview.com/how-to-get-electronic-cigarettes-for-free/

e-Swisher e-Cigarettes Bet Big with World Series of Poker« Partnership

Posted on 13/7/2013 at 11:24 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Because of e-Swisher e-cigarettes, poker enthusiasts no longer have to excuse themselves from the table to have a smoke, whether at a casino, a local retail poker room or the neighbors weekly poker game, explained Ed Denk, Director of Marketing for Swisher International. Our partnership with World Series of Poker helps to reinforce this with amateur and professional poker players alike. About e-Swisher e-Swisher is a line of e-cigarettes and e-cigars external link by Jacksonville, Fla.-based Swisher International. e-Swisher e-cigarettes, now available in new Soft Tip disposables, come in both disposable and rechargeable options. The e-cigar is Soft Tip disposable with a sweet taste similar to the Swisher Sweets cigar.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/07/11/3495871/e-swisher-e-cigarettes-bet-big.html

E-Cigarettes Gaining Popularity in Boston

(Yes, confession, I smoked for almost a decade. I also taught Pilates while smoking. In fact, youd be surprised how many people in the fitness industry were out back puffing away with me. New story idea: Squats and Smoke: The Fitness Industrys Dirty Secret.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bostonmagazine.com/health/blog/2013/07/12/e-cigarettes-gaining-popularity-in-boston/


e-Swisher e-Cigarettes Bet Big with World Series of Poker« Partnership

Posted on 13/7/2013 at 11:24 - 0 Comments - Post Comment - Link

Because of e-Swisher e-cigarettes, poker enthusiasts no longer have to excuse themselves from the table to have a smoke, whether at a casino, a local retail poker room or the neighbors weekly poker game, explained Ed Denk, Director of Marketing for Swisher International. Our partnership with World Series of Poker helps to reinforce this with amateur and professional poker players alike. About e-Swisher e-Swisher is a line of e-cigarettes and e-cigars external link by Jacksonville, Fla.-based Swisher International. e-Swisher e-cigarettes, now available in new Soft Tip disposables, come in both disposable and rechargeable options. The e-cigar is Soft Tip disposable with a sweet taste similar to the Swisher Sweets cigar.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/07/11/3495871/e-swisher-e-cigarettes-bet-big.html

E-Cigarettes Gaining Popularity in Boston

(Yes, confession, I smoked for almost a decade. I also taught Pilates while smoking. In fact, youd be surprised how many people in the fitness industry were out back puffing away with me. New story idea: Squats and Smoke: The Fitness Industrys Dirty Secret.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bostonmagazine.com/health/blog/2013/07/12/e-cigarettes-gaining-popularity-in-boston/


┬ź Last Page :: Next Page ┬╗
Hosting door HQ ICT Systeembeheer